Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

Jonathan Bennett

View blog's RSS Feed

Beyond the Code

or, how to win friends, influence people and make a living by writing open source software. It's not just about the code.

Follow me on Twitter as @jonobennett.

Thursday 2 November 2006, 1:00 PM

Web Science, texting, and creative misuse

Posted by Jonathan Bennett

You'd have thought that, having invented it, Tim Berners-Lee would know how the web worked. The Web Science project he wants to launch will study the World Wide Web, how it's working and what's being done with it. This might sound a bit pointless -- surely he just has to look at the web to see what people are using it for? -- but Berners-Lee has a very good point: there are so many different things being done on the web, in so many different ways, that it's difficult to tell what works and what doesn't. None of this is anything to do with the W3C's traditional area of markup languages, protocols and specifications; it's about the human aspect of the web.

The technology that makes the web possible is deliberately simple, open and flexible. This gave it a low barrier to entry -- particularly compared with Ted Nelson's stillborn Project Xanadu -- and meant that people were able to run in all directions with it. It also meant it was impossible to keep track of what applications people used it for. Sure, most people creating the web know how a web site works, but ask them and chances are they'll start talking about HTML.

It's important for anyone creating an information system -- even those that don't involve "computers" -- to realise that people aren't going to use it in the way you intended, and they're even going to use it in ways that never crossed your mind. A prime example of this is the Short Message Service on mobile phones. This was added to the GSM standard, almost as an afterthought, with applications like voicemail notifications and telemetry in mind. Had you told the engineers responsible that years later SMS would be used by skool kdz txtN ea othR 2 sA SUL, I imagine they'd have been horrified. Why go to all that bother, when you can use the same piece of equipment to just talk to each other?

We're an inventive species. Our ability to take something designed as a tool for one thing, and turn it into a tool for something else is how we make progress much of the time. For this to be truly successful, we should take the time to look back at ourselves to see where we're doing this well, and where it's not going so great.

Comments on this post

To add a comment, fill out the form below


Jonathan Bennett

This member is ranked #14 in our top 100

  • Jonathan Bennett
  • Applications Development, London
  • Member since: October 2006

Site Activity Rating 5

CoreTechs

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 1,977

ator1940 ator1940

AOL's Steve Case

Wednesday 23 December 2009, 12:31 PM

1 comment
ator1940 ator1940

Plurk holding Microsoft's feet to...

Tuesday 22 December 2009, 3:00 PM

3 comments
Jake Rayson Jake Rayson

Why don't people delete old emails?

Thursday 17 December 2009, 5:30 PM

8 comments

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 18

Avatar Tom Espiner

Twitter hack was DNS redirect

Monday 21 December 2009, 4:43 PM

1 comment
Avatar Adrian Bridgwater

Sun Shines On Cloud Security

Friday 18 December 2009, 12:55 PM

1 comment
Avatar David Meyer

Android passes 20,000 apps mark

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 5:05 PM

0 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters