I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari explain the CEC Charity endowment part 6.

Part 6

As I reflect in my journal upon the previous parts, I see that to many the rationale for the Charitable Endowment Council, or CEC, and the various Charities I support may need clarification today. I would like to establish independence totally from any ilicit activity and go over the whys of my personal charitable activity. As a gift giver in the past, I want to set up a pattern and methodology for giving and endowment that is legal, ethical, logical and solves all problems regarding giving to Charities anywhere. I was advised by my counsels that a Federal Foundation which sets up charities in an unbrella can solve all issues and at the same time do lots of good in general. As a system, it is normal, regular and totally legal. So much so that it is used by church associations and other charities that have a similar issue but a local need for seperate charitable dispersion and use.

Personal Statement- part 6- A

I Abdul Taw’ala Ibn Ali Alishtari executed a number of Endowment affidavits on GPN Wholesale Direct Sales Consortium letterhead. This agency was a subsidiary of GlobalProtector.Net, Inc., AKA GPN. GPN was sold the next year to EDI Secure LLLP that became assigned and sold to IDPixie, LLC a year after that. All contracts and endowments were continued from one corporate entity to the next. In all these entities, I was the CEO although I never owned EDI Secure LLP or IDPixie, LLC.

This is an explanation of the forgiveness/settlement/endowment affidavit agreement line by line. I think a line by line explanation is best to not confuse anyone of even one word of it. If this does not relate to you, please skip, as this does not directly relate to ID theft save that beneficiaries of the charities have to indentify themselves to the Foundation setting it all up respectively.

The blank endowment affidavit seen in "Personal Statement- part 6-B records promises as facts. The “Wherefore” statement by myself says I owned company and intellectual property of value, present tense to that deal, not specifically refers to patents, but including all intellectual properties such as patents pending. Also, that I seek to do good things in the public domain.

Then, I resolve to fund many Charities. I did fund the Global Peace Film Festival, Inc., a known charity, publicly, which made me legally a philanthropist . I will do this in Washington DC under the US of A Foundations laws as agreed with CEC counsel of record for all Charity beneficiaries.

In addition, the “Wherefores” sets up a Charity Endowment Council, or "CEC", as an ad hoc unicorporated benevolent association, representing specified numbered Charity for beneficiaries who are party to affidavits by recognition and signing for Charity beneficiaries. That CEC is seeking an endowment for its participating beneficial charities. All charities are divided into either a family Charity or a community Charity of unrelated beneficiaries. No Charity can violate U. S. of A. Federal laws and any violation of U. S. Code is adverse to endowment funding. U. S. of A. federal rules require 4% placement on balance sums annually with a Charity and the rest can be used as Charity likes for beneficiaries, indeed including for profit uses if handled right.

Respective counsels to each CEC Charity must explain all law since any coverage here by me is cursory and only for general reference of my understanding of my rights and duties. It is not meant to be a legal opiinion or legal advice to any CEC Charity or beneficiary thereto.

Lastly, endowment is the will of myself, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, per se, and it is assignable to whomever is beneficary thereto through corporate inheritance even though I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, may no longer own the gifted assets personally pre-given as endowments per se.

The Bahamian lease forgiveness/settlement/endowment affidavit deal sets a Charity as a member of the CEC and it says I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, by my hand will do endowments from corpus profits pro rate to 1% net income for 20 years from start. This is why I kept control of management of IDPixie LLC since no one else feels the need, desire and/or the duty to fulfill my promises perfectly.

Article 1 sets the legal venue in Washington D.C., which domesticate U. S. of A. Charities.

Article 2 disallows a felon or a person of questionable character with misrepresentations or acts of lying, on record, to be a trustee.

Article 3 sets a U.S. of A. Federal authority under the Court of Congress since D.C. venue is that can arbitrate any disputes assuming the trustee cannot be challenged for any legal reason.

Article 4 means Charities will acknowledge that what is gifted is received with a receipt, which usually means showing a tax-exempt number on letterhead and other legal requirements to me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, or more properly to my Foundation counsels and assigns.

Article 5 is a forgiveness statement saying each CEC Charity and beneficiaries thereto has no other claim whatsoever save on what it is endowed as a gift, which means all other debts related to these Charitable beneficiaries of record, including The Bahamian leases, are written off as a loss and are therefore moot. Also, moot business should not be entertained for any discusion at all since it might lead to misunderstandings or worse, misrepresentations.

Article 6 indicates the nature of the CEC Charity is only and always non-profit, which is further proof of separation from any for-profit activity since the settlement is to set up a type of CEC Charity and not to pay income, fees or funds to any persons as a type of for-profit deal of any type. The moot debt and live gift are not related save by benevolence of beneficiaries on one part and by myself on the other part.

Article 7 is an agreement to set up a Charity, Charity Endowment Council, ostensibly since it doesn't say otherwise as an ad hoc unincorporated association, which will act as a billing agent to split the 1% of profits granted to the CEC Charities as a group split prorate or by number of charity numbers per se. Further clarifying, the Foundation gets 10% of IDPixie LLC net income and it gives 10% gross of that 10% net IDPixie LLC income which is 1% net of IDPixie LLC net income as a pass through to the CEC audit for distribution equally to all CEC Charities. The Foundation actually distributes it according to CEC audit respectively.

Article 8 limits endowment for 20 years from setting up of CEC Charities as negotiated by counsels. It was originally 10 years and agreed on 20 years. This is why the later the set up closer to profit the better for CEC Charities in terms of specific non-profit profitability.

Article 9 is an agreement to be trained, at my, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari’s, cost for travel and lodging, in D.C. using his D.C. counsels. This allows for a one-time good resolution and unified handling inside the U. S. of A. This also indicates that CEC Charities must identify trustees to me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, for handling timely.

Article 10 sets an equal amount for each number of endowment sums and that sum is a gift sum set by settlement in favor of endowment after forgiveness of all offshore leases per se. Each CEC Charity gets the same endowment sum gift amount.

Article 11 sets a multiplier as only one per Charity for sum of endowment so that CEC Charity number 2 and CEC Charity 120 are all for the same sum with no change in value.

Article 12 sets that Charity funds are unrelated to any for-profit activity anywhere by anyone for any reason and that it is therefore a stand-alone issue. Even though an U. S. of A. Washington DC Federal charity may own a for profit LLC for handling business affairs, stocks and other valuable issues in the for profit spectrum, the Charity itself must be non-profit and fulfill all U. S. of A. Federal requirements.

Article 13 says CEC Charity accepts funds only from endowment to charity from me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari for a gifting reason. I expect no Charity giving me any funds for any reason that I can concieve and I use no other Charity or Foundation to represent me at all.

Article 14 has the Charity agreeing to shoulder the cost of its own association separate from me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, since a benevolent association such as the CEC is separate from me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari’s, and my corpus title and needs. If there is ever a need for arbitration between my Foundation and the CEC Charities, I don't want to have any standing in the matter at all. Full endowment is given to the Foundation and any escrows created because of CEC lack of audit are not my business but Charity business amongst the non-profit community.

Article 15 has the set up fees paid by me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, as part of the cost of his endowment business and as is normal for umbrella charity foundations set up in Washington D. C. Federally. I did this to make sure they all conform to law and nothing which is unacceptable to Federal rules slips through the cracks.

Article 16 says Charity is not going to act like a rogue or outlaw agency inside the U. S. of A but abide by all pertinent Federal charitable laws and procedures or risk de-funding under other rules infra. If a Charity is set to take care of family and that family is not served by that Charity with notices to Foundation and U. S. Congressional Court authorities, then, Court rules affect further resolution thereto. My Foundation's only concern is legal filing and seeming compliance to U. S. Code, challenge thereto causes immediate either arbitration or filing for resolution to the pertinent civil court in Washington DC.

Article 17 is called in NYS the Rockefeller gag proviso, meaning Charity cannot continue to be funded if its agents or parties act against me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, or his family in any way. My gift is not set up to cause harm and I will not fund a charity that is libeling, slandering or causing harm to my family or my corpus. That would be illogical and unwise. Therefore, this gag provision exists to protect the giftor's ability to earn more to give more which is quite logical.

Article 18 follows up Article 17 by defining who are agents or parties to block funding of Charity. If a Charity beneficiary allows his lawyer, family or agent to bad mouth IDPixie LLC, myself, Abdul Tawala Alishtari, or the Foundation, then, that is the same as doing it yourself and you suffer the same consequences. You might ask legally for my Foundation to show cause and I have directed my foundation to not only videotape records, affidavits and all statements but to back it up with twice the proofs necessary to make it rock hard.

Article 19 covers a private gag, as in memos, talk, chat or verbal poison pen and personality assassination, which is covered by any media. There are those now who are running blogs to destroy the CEC Charity and me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari. This was written before those blogs existed so if evidence links anyone to those blogs, their Charities suffer. It is my thinking the only reason someone doesn't want a Charity funded is that entity cannot allow an audit thereto because of irregularities in the trusteeship thereto. Otherwise, it is only logical to let profit gift to beneficiaries. If there are any other views of why, I am interested in hearing them.

Article 20 gives a hold harmless for any acts, which may be perceived to be against the CEC Charity like funding expansion and overhead instead of declaring bigger profits and making more for the pool of CEC Charities. The purpose of a for profit business it profits and gifting though in this case set up in advance is a secondary activity. It is easy for Charities to criticize the building of a building since they do not know the business plan serving board owners and they should not know those privy details which only generally have anything to do with the CEC Charity itself.

Charities. Article 21 protects me, Mr. Abdul Alishtari, and my corpus, from errors or harmful acts by the CEC Charities, their trustees or the charities beneficiaries, which is needed since I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, as settler, cannot be seen to be in collusion with any criminal behavior from whatever sector. Lets say a Charity does a crime and says I advised them either to do it or was managing that crime, well, I cannot nor would not be party or linked to any criminal activity by anyone of any persuasion.

Article 22 stops quibbling over cross-charitable giving since there is no restriction on my, Mr. Alishtari, and my Foundation giving more to charities and this document only sets the minimum limits. Lets say one Charity is building hospitals and I decide to buy ambulances, no other Charity has the right to say where is my ambulances or equal sums in cash as a right of giving from my endowment so agreed.

Article 23 sets U. S. of A. Federal venue good standing qualifications for trustees so that they may be established which usually means getting finger printed and possibly lie detector tested as well as whatever is standard to satisfy US of A standards. If you are a crook, liar, thief, get lost.

Article 24 means all disputes will be handled by one local agency known to my, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari’s, counsels and of high quality. Local means inside Washington DC and known to various Federal Foundation authorities as an agency of choice for this act.

Article 25 means any criticism Mr. Alishtari for term of 20 years will stop Charity funding as an adverse act at such time of offense. Before the media age, sour grapes were letters to the editor or even letters to pertinent authorities however today the Internet proves some garbage, especially lies and hurtful slander, is permanent. Therefore, the results for doing such crimes and hurtful acts should be equally permanent.

Charity beneficiaries who make uneducated statements about funds, false investments or lease rebates are talking about an animal that is a legal chimera that does not exist legally or in fact. Such talk indicates either the alleged Charity beneficiary is adverse to its trustee of record or that beneficiary needs to adjust, command its trustee to act according to this deal as shown before and above respectively.

Anyone giving promises on my Foundation to be set by me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari thereto is a liar. Only I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, control my corpus charitable endowment deal related to the forgiveness/settlement/endowment affidavit deal mentioned in these particulars. Without a respective signed affidavit by both parties, there is no funding or deal legally.

Furthermore even in the case of a gift program, accurate audits regarding how many beneficiaries and who they are must be made to me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, by the CEC, the Charity Association, as well as proof respective Charity beneficiaries empowered their trustees in a fair legal agreement acceptable under U. S. of A. Federak Law.

If there are trustees acting for anyone other than all their Charity beneficiaries or attempting to hide any international crime done by them, that act is violating the letter and spirit of endowment giving.

In addition, Charity beneficiaries might impeach a trustee with evidences. Trustees might impeach other trustees for control of a Charity for any reason and anything that is normal charitable activity is accepted my me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, for my corpus gift giving program and will not stop funding of charities per se through my Foundation for escrows.