Tuesday 23 January 2007, 10:16 PM

I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari explain CEC Charity adverse clause part 6C

Posted by Abdul Tawala Alishtari

Part 6C

As I reflect in my journal upon the previous parts, I feel the Charitable Endowment Council, or CEC, Charity adverse clause needs special identification and clarification. I reveiw adverse clauses for claims against others and arbitration below just for public record...

I, Mr. Abdul Taw’ala Ibn Ali Alishtari, executed several Endowment affidavits with particulars on adverse behavior by Charity agents for Charities. The adverse clause provisions might by incident, and by CEC Charity lawful, reporting, actually increase endowment value to a CEC Charity by eliminating payments to adverse entities. The adverse clauses give power to a CEC Charity for increasing endowment cash gifting. This is by non-profit Charity maintaining a peaceful, non-contentious and organized system of gift giving, of distribution and of receipt in accordance to affidavit rules.

The adverse clauses protect my gift Endowment deal and myself by halting all adverse acts that are against each CEC Charity’s best interest for beneficial pro-bono funding. It does so without any risk to the tax-exempt nature of each CEC Charity. The Part C-B, supra, affidavit sanitizes, legally cleans up, all global business, of record between others and myself, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, by nullifying and voiding disputed Bahamian equipment leases whose integrity might be questioned, or attacked, under bank treaties, as valid in all venues. Therefore, all those leases are now moot, void and a nullity.

Any CEC Charity might increase its own non-profit gifting sums by giving to me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, legitimate and viable third party evidences with affidavits to prove any other CEC Charity parties have done adverse acts in writing, in word or in witnessed statement against my family, my business or me in any media. A reporting witness, per se, might not be at risk, as long as he or she did not violate any adverse clauses or do crimes. If a CEC Charity’s agent, for instance, heard another CEC Charity agent refers to my family, my business or myself in an adverse way, with third party affidavit proof of that in writing on the offending CEC Charity agent per affidavit particulars.

The reporting CEC Charity’s agent witnessing this, as a fact, must give me affidavit proof such an adverse act from the alleged adverse entity was sent and received by any media to it including orally. This might lead to a CEC Charity being blocked and/or banned from future funding of that CEC Charity from the date of verification.

This, then, nullifies, not the reporting CEC Charity itself, but blocks further and future endowment to another CEC Charities offending the adverse clause of affidavit. This "impeachment" might be good since all CEC Charities funded stand to benefit by increasing pro rata their income from the shared endowment. I will leave no CEC Charity that has signed settlement outside the safety net of endowment save all who lack proof one should exist for funding. This does not mean any charity will not be funded; actually the reverse is true. All Charities will be funded however some might be put in escrow for proper U. S. of A. Federal authorities if fundalmental irregularities or errors against the law are discovered or are reported.

The purpose of every charity is to benefit its beneficiaries and no block to that must be seen in any curing forms. All resolution of CEC Charity gifting must fit within my safety net and all proof of any damage by CEC Charity agents to my name, myself or to my companies is requested by me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, Charity settler now.

Thus, in a case of 240+ CEC Charities splitting 1% net IDPixie LLC profits from my endowment thereto, actual funds might be increased to 239 other non-offending CEC Charities if any Charity is exposed as a fraud or a chimera. The loss of one CEC Charity going adverse and de-funded from future non-profit gifting, increases the actual dollars gifted to all other CEC Charities without changing funding volume.

Submitting documentation of the type requested will not stop each affidavit CEC Charity being set up or stop its initial funding per se. However, adverse acts may cause an escrow to be created managed by a Federal arbitrator or appropriate objective third party paid executor while claims are reviewed.

An investigation will not stop initial CEC Charity incorporation or endowment process though it may affect its timeliness. Violating adverse clauses may cause a punitive reduction of value to offenders after third party verification and submission to Federal arbitration establishes a right to end or discontinue future endowment. Furthermore, all appeal of arbitration by Federal Foundation authority rulings must be through the court process of the Court of the US Federal Congress as it applies.

Any proof of adverse acts by a CEC Charity agent forces the arbitration clause whereas a third party Federal foundation authority must review the documentation and decide whether the proofs constituted unlawful breach of the adverse clause and indeed warranted all escrowed funds to be split for distribution to CEC Charities. Even the having of evidences, with substantial and damning proofs, might not stop my setting up of any CEC Charity per se, however adverse evidences might block the non-profit further funding endowment of a CEC Charity beyond my initial funding.

If a CEC Charity’s agent or beneficiary was adverse to the CEC in writing, this is not a breach of the adverse clause included in the affidavit however if someone wants to be party to a CEC Charity arrangement and at the same time, criticize the gift giving and or gift giver, then what is called in NYS a Rockefeller type clause provision in the Foundation affidavit agreement prevents adverse acts from continuing from a fie. The correct behavior of a Charity is to be polite and professionally modest. Any other type of behavior causes breach of adverse relations provisions that have dire consequences for any one CEC Charity. One should not bite the hand that feeds it.

There has been considerable discussion on various agents of the CEC itself taking adverse positions to the CEC per se. Taking adverse positions against oneself is not a violation of the affidavit per se however any statement against my corpus, my family or myself is adverse. Such breach might is cause to block a CEC Charity to become funded after incorporation and to furthermore from that point onwards to de-fund it. This de-funding can take place only for discovered acts with proofs at any point in the twenty year endowment relationship of the Charity such that a Charity could receive, say, millions USD over a several year period and verified proofs of adverse behavior by beneficiaries or trustees might and should cause a cessation of all further funding of said CEC Charity for term of endowment due to documented adverse behavior in violation of the Rockefeller type clause of the affidavit. It is a control.

Lets say someone asked a CEC Charity’s agency to send adverse data against my corpus, my business or my person to a third party, the only way a CEC Charity’s agent or beneficiary could protect itself is to evidence the adverse act against me by making an affidavit of disavowal. This states that although CEC Charity’s agency name is associated with the adverse statements that the CEC Charity’s agent agency is innocent of making these statements and the CEC Charity’s agency disavows these statements as untrue hearsay, slander and libel. Disavowal by CEC Charity with a corresponding affidavit is a positive act protecting the CEC Charity from harm.

If this affidavit and proofs are not notarized by CEC Charity’s agent then that data is hearsay. If another CEC Charity’s agent notarizes proof your CEC Charity did the offending adverse act first, this would make a block for the reported CEC Charity from full benefit of endowment due to it having to go to Federal arbitration for discovery of a lawful resolutions of gift giving according to US Federal laws

There is a salutatory effect of the CEC Charity affidavits. The CEC Charity affidavits took a disputed lease or possible security and it made it legal onshore in the US of A after forgiveness since there is no profit to anyone from nullified leases and no damages to anyone anywhere respectively. Even if it was declared a security, its voiding means no fault, no damage to any parties.

Furthermore, my endowment gift giving program to CEC Charities funds no rebate of nullified deal assets. Any language suggesting that act is adverse language to legal fact and it is possibly causing de-funding of a CEC Charity from adverse acts. Remember another provisional clause of the affidavit states no CEC Charity may break any laws in the US of A in any way. Here language is critical since for-profit language is adverse to legal fact and use of for-profit language to explain CEC Charity benefits is not only wrong but also it is adverse to the CEC Charity affidavit on file

My personal experience is whenever any entity threatens me or tries to blackmail, or greenmail, me, my first response is to go to my counsel and say how do I best report this so I disavow the allegations and cause no harm to my company, family and name.

Several years ago, a person wrote hate mail advising sundry persons against me. The email said if I didn’t do what was asked economically, they would go to the authorities. This was adverse. I got the note, went to my counsel, who contacted the FBI in that venue and reported it to the FBI so they could ask the writer what is their intent. That is what an honest person does since I knew despite adverse personality assassination I had not broken any law or made errors.

Still, if those persons executed an affidavit after that, I would watch them, but not ban or block that CEC Charity endowment gift, unless new and recorded adverse behavior persists with evidences of such adverse acts

The adverse clause is punitive. I must have no obstruction to building my business and this clause stops the adverse breach of confidentiality and hold harmless provisions of the affidavit. It was made to curtail any and all adverse attacks against my business, against my family or against me personally that might have a damaging effect upon my business, my family or my personal production of profit for endowment and other normal concerns during the 20-year term of endowment both before non-profit CEC Charity incorporation and after non-profit CEC Charity incorporation.

The adverse clause can only be used on each CEC Charity whose agents or beneficiaries act in a manner adverse to the affidavit on file that guarantees my endowment otherwise it gifts for a term of 20 years.

Any language used by a CEC Charity that refers to a non-profit gift as a for-profit return on investment, security or cash rebate is adverse. Any insults, jokes, sarcastic rejoinders, sardonic parodies or any other type of critical assessments indicating error, blame, fault, corruption, crimes, foolishness, un-professionalism, criticism or disdain of my business, of my family or of myself are seen as adverse for action by my counsels and corpus to halt all work for further endowment of violating CEC Charity once it is set up legally.

• 0 comments  | 
• Post a comment  | 
• TrackBack  | 
• Clip Link

• Share this post:
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
•