I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari trust the CEC Charity unincorporated assn 6D

Part 6D

As I reflect in my journal upon the previous parts, I trust the Charitable Endowment Council, or CEC, unincorporated association of settlement of The Bahamian equipment leases due to the below. Some of my people feel don't talk about bad things which the company survived however I think it is a good thing an ID theft company survived, ID theft and corporate espionage itself. The protocols I have had to put into place to stop cyber thieves and all types of criminals would be helpful to any business. I think we need more candor in the ID theft protection business since many companies advertise what cannot protect and the thieves are having a hey day. So, why not try candor when all else fails...

I, Mr. Abdul Taw’ala Ibn Ali Alishtari, trust the CEC Charities and its unicorported association because it is in everyone's best interest to sanitize moot and dead Bahamian equipment lease contracts executed in the Freeport Freezone in The Bahamas by forgiving them and in a legal and regular manner by settling all charities for legal beneficiaries in Washington DC openly and plainly.

I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, control intellectual property and patents owned by IDPixie LLC which is essential to the security of banks, governments and private persons today.

My public record of building EDI's globally and providing for my clients the top security is to date a perfect record with not one breach of my system or technologies. I published online repeatedly whatever I was doing so everyone could see it.

My lawyers in various venues vetted my leases to make sure one venue was not violating another venues law. My financial correspondent companies were licensed, as an offshore guild, to police the global traffic of offshore leases to make sure all laws were honored and no illegal acts happened.

Still, industrial espionage, infiltration and forgery worked in tandem with corrupting subcontractors and offshore electronic gold companies to seize my company or force me to sell it to, well, bad people. My now moot equipment leases for Internet network sharing within regions were not collateral for any security or equity stock in any company nor were they made to be a stand alone investment. My leases forbade any crime.

Forgery, disinformation and extortion by now known Canadian felons and cronies failed to bring me down or force the sale of IDPixie LLC. As the old saw goes, what has not destroyed us makes us stronger.

My attorneys felt it was better to pay gifts to the CEC Charity beneficiaries than to let anyone even distantly associated with me to be scared of me for doing business while Arab. One of the things I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, have always been proud of is I brought all my projects in under budget and to the benefit of all involved.

My counsels designed a lawful resolution for my one gray area, The Bahamian leases with a blanket forgiveness setting up CEC Charity beneficiaries. However, my enemies failure to force me into bankruptcy caused them the only recourse left sending out poison pen letters to try to force everyone else to avoid me. At first, I chose to overlook conflicts by these sour grape Canadian felon associates but why not respond to it. I did nothing wrong.

It did not matter who said what or what anyone felt if a safety net was created for the innocent such that past leases were nullified and I funded endowments to various and sundry beneficiaries for the public good. As an ex-bank committee appointed official, I know elegant solutions are better than meaningless gestures. I did what I did to destroy any damage to common folks. No damage also was my tradition with those who backed me that no one got hurt from a safe ID protection system that also benefited charities.

Opposing Canadian counsel after deliberations said after signing this he personally had to outmaneuver one Canadian from the group of representative trustees who he said dumped liability for a loss with a bunch of persons in another deal whose funds vanished. He said he flew to Europe and retrieved the funds returning them despite the other Canadian's attempt to blame this attorney, himself, for the loss.

Some of these same Canadians did not sign their affidavits personally since they themselves cannot prove they were the beneficiaries however all speculation will be resolved after Charity set up in Washington DC. I will let the marketplace reveal what is true and what is myth.

I don’t know the truth to who betrayed who. The offshore world is a murky no man's land where people walk around with billions and no one traditionally asked any questions. Even this came out indirectly while in talks on other banks looking for ID theft protection security. It went a long way to encouraging me to honor the CEC Charity affidavits since I felt I might be dealing with an honorable group that respected morality in a way I do myself.

I have no relationship to the Canadian felon's groups directly so I don't understand animosity save I banned them from being licensed to me or having anything to do with me. My banning of them is consistent. The felon's group insisted on a link converting my agents and employees to their agents and employees as affidavits and memos by those agents say they did themselves. I do not know why those I tried to not do business stole my ID for fraud. I did everything in my power to ban and to block anyone with dubious records.

Why did I ban my first Canadian in 1996? My answer is simple. He failed a fingerprinting test by burning off his fingertips with acid and my lawyers said anyone who burns off his fingerprints is not a good business risk associate or ally. His replies as to why he did it and all his grand theft auto admissions, in writing, that he now denies are moot. I don’t care to know why he did it. I also blocked another Canadian who served time for shipping heroin in bric-a-brac.

Earlier a year ago, evirons, the FBI showed up at my door asking if I could help them against the several Canadians by name, I asked them two questions. The first was after saying I was under counsel advice and I didn’t think I could answer questions, I asked why they needed my help and I asked if it would cost me cash which I don’t have? They hemmed and hawed.

They might intimidate me if I wa hiding. Here, the FBI was asking my help in my pajamas. I gave them my attorneys phone number and they called him, but he wasn’t in yet at 8 AM. I believe my attorney advised them, later, that I surrendered all my bank records and lots of records. He advised me I could not afford the cost of summarizing my reflections in a legal memorandum since I was, well, low on funds.

If the SEC and FBI had not insisted on a written memorandum that would cost me over half a million USD I would not have used my rights to stop cooperating. As it was, I had to sell two homes and liquidate all my cars and furniture to pay my lawyers while I had two more cases ongoing against two E-Gold licensees that I later won.

It was the right decision to put my cash where I might get some cash and not put it where I got nothing save an empty victory. I had fully cooperated until my funds ran low. I am a businessman and what I did was the right decision based upon my resources at hand.

In 2002, an affidavit by a Mr. Dennis Krauter said the now known Canadian felon is affiliated with my consultant in Canada who was licensed to an offshore financial correspondent company originally from the Isle of Mann, then The Bahamas and finally from Panama. The Canadian friend of the Canadian felon I had trusted.

A 2004 memo written by this friend of felony admitted he was a partner with the Canadian felon's partner hmm. 2004 memos by the Canadian CFO of a Nevada corpus, Mr. Curtis Mann, another Canadian I stopped for trying to link me to an imaginary Canadian bank in 2001. Mr. Mann bragged about character assassination poisoning my family, my business and me. The plot thickens. My Canadian consultant was employed by both Canadian felony partners while being licensed to me and then he wrote an affidavit admitting forgery.

Mr. Krauter, who is a Canadian good guy, made his affidavit in 2002 predicting a team of Canadian fraudsters, including the now admitted felon as proved by their own memos were a criminal ID theft syndicate. Mr. Krauter said they will sully my good name, dismantle my business, take it over and profit from illegal scams. This seemed unbelievable in 2002 but, well, it is more believable after the fact.

I like most bankers though ID theft to be like occasional and not major in 2001. My ex-consultant leaked his own 2004 memos to another Canadian investor while fund raising. In it, he has his CFO, Mr. Curtis Mann, another banned trickster, name the scam they did upon me as a “Dump and Run”. This certified Mr. Krautner's warning.

I also banned a lot of people on my White List, who I did not know personally. I cancelled people for minor irregularities. They were not offering me funds so I avoided them under my constitution. I felt safe but that is exactly how an ID thief wants you to feel before raising money in your name for a dump and run. Ignorance is no excuse under the law if I commit a crime and my alert to unrelated crimes did not make sense. I hadn’t committed a crime so I was safe. Not good enough today since ID thieves love denial.

I did meet the Canadian felon in February 2003 a full year before he confessed his crimes in Canada in October 2004. He said he was a trustee for others, which skirted my ban, as he bought out various leaseholders and thus become, in his own words, a big power. Listening to his words, my attorneys grew fearful. The various counsels had a disagreement as to any potential harm by him since we did not know what he was saying to others on the nature of past lawful leases on the Internet for banks based upon contracts.

Not knowing what he was saying meant there was a possibility he misrepresented me. Furthermore, the Bahamian meeting of 2003 was where leaseholding trustees voted in new representation. It was where I said past leases, in writing, and on videotape, were moot and must be settled by funds and profits from my U. S. of A. endeavors since my counsels felt there was too much talk of money laundering.

At the Bahamian conference, I showed the moot lease holders some proprietary product systems that in and of themselves could make me almost a billion dollars USD by giving online security to banks and the US Government through our bundling system. Simply, no one can hack my system that uses the computer and an offline device that is one application of my patent which hadn't been granted yet.

However, I never went into my patent since it was pending then plus the potential for the full patent deployment is beyond estimatable values. Imagine getting $0.25 cents to $0.50 cents for every one of the 8 trillion swipes of a card in the world. It threatens to be so big that I didn’t want to give anyone hearing hyperbole since I wanted them to believe. My patent was not granted until July 22 2003.

Before that, I had a functional market ready use product and all I had to do was take it to market. This has a salutary effect on all in attendance however I was later to discover that various crooks present started lobbying that I should just give it to them entirely. This was nonsensical for several reasons.

The first is by declaring the leases moot in The Bahamian venue, debt was dead and I thought it gracious and generous to settle with them lease values which my attorneys told me repeatedly I did not have to do. I had done best efforts and failed. It was global treaties that made my Bahamian system non-viable and not anything I did with it

The Canadian felon was linked to an American woman consultant to my prime contractors. She claimed qualifications while working. She personally led efforts to dismantle my consultant investigation group, advised her partners on inside values as she dismantled my platform forcing me to sublease to a contractor who was corrupted by her.

My subcontractor has her on videotape advising anyone who would listen to her that the only way to profit was to takeover my company products. She spread rumors I had to go to jail I guess for imagined crimes, or possibly for crimes of the Canadian felon who was blaming me for his crimes. He failed to trick me, into selling stock or hiring him as a cash agent. No one had made any investment by into GlovalProtector.Net, Inc. or EDI Secure LLP stock except me. I owned it 100% as a closely held venture with no stock out to others.

To gain my trust, some Canadians gave me copies of Internet emails and sites showing other Canadians linked to the felons were bad guys too. They showed BC Canada’s SEC took over a number of businesses owned by one family of one person Mr. Krauter called a crook. The Canadians, in question, don't use their own names; prefering to use others as agents. Still his surname is sullied by his family's misdeeds.

Most people don’t know that two entities were first into the gold e-commerce community. One was a guy who later built GoldMoney for Barclay’s Bank, a very respectable and quite proper operation and the other was myself in my flat exchange built for Arabs in the Gulf.

Almost all the others were sued by the Barclay genius for using his virtual software from a stolen laptop. His case in NYS alleges this allowed E-Gold and all of its licensees to compete illegally and to create a virtual marketplace of competition without using bank accounting protocols used, or course, by Barclays.

It is also public record that cyber crooks, mafias and extortionists use E-Gold or E-Gold licensees as favored banks for Internet scams especially to casinos. The Canadian felon flew in to see me in Florida 22 months before becoming a felon. He insisted on meeting me in DC at a Republican business conference where I won a Republican Businessman of the Year Award from the US Republican Congressional Committee meeting the Hon. Newt Gingrich.

The Candian felon lobbied hard for an E-Gold licensee and I conceded to place some funds with that E-Gold licensee after the lady in his employ working for my subcontractor verified it was OK. Now, I did not know it was an E-Gold licensee since I had previously for two years been suing another E-Gold licensee for stealing my cash, which case I later won. I am certain she knew it.

This inside man, call her Dragon woman, ran and oversaw the E-Gold licensee bonafides hiding its E-Gold link. I would find only later that this company had direct links and cross licenses to the E-Gold licensee I was actively suing for stealing millions USD in cash. I would not have licensed it or opened accounts there knowing it was linked to E-Gold that had resisted US Federal subpoenas to its offshore ownership, one shareholder theretom Mr. Zidar, who was in Federal prison for securities fraud.

The Canadian felon's plan seemed to be freeze my offshore cash, offer me a buyout, steal my assets, freeze my funds and then dump all his illegal securities fraud which never came to me in such a way that I go to jail. His partner claimed to have done this before in Seattle Washington Mr. Zidar now in U. S. Federal prison for fraud. The difference was Mr. Zidar did crimes and I returned cash sent me to link me to crimes. The Canadian felon's partner's brag they got Mr. Zidar's assets in E-Gold offshore. The Canadian felon blamed me for his crimes, which the OSC found untrue. My January 2003 videotaped written direction said "Stop All Work". His plan was brilliant and should have worked had I been even a little corrupt.

Despite all the above acts, I stand by the CEC Charity affidavits and this is why. I think all the beneficiaries of the offshore leases that are now moot, which became beneficiaries of CEC Charities, are good people. They were conned too though not by me. They are victims of ID theft, money laundering and any number of scams. The E-Gold licensee were promoted by the Canadian felon.

I believe the agents who represent CEC Charities genuinely want resolution for all beneficiaries. For two years, the Canadian has been raising funds to sue me but he has no case. Hearsay from criminals is not acceptable by any legal authority. In the end, I settled this for my children. I make for my children a safe profitable environment and I trust the CEC Charities agents thereto

I can be doggedly and unrelently tough as I did a TRO on one E-Gold licensee freezing its US funds and it settled with a gag order so I cannot say its name per se. I did a global Mareva, TRO, on E-Gold’s other licensee that settled giving errors by E-Gold’s counsel on shared escrows violating its corporate lawyer insurance in Maryland. E-Gold settled but I can say E-Gold all I want as long as I don’t lie about it which I do not do. I liquidated assets and settled leases with the CEC Charity affidavits that tricksters' thought they will control if I sold out to them. If you think I am a wimp, look again.

I was released by letter from the Canadian OSC investigation after it reviewed records given to the US SEC. Over the last two years, Arab bankers in several deals offered me over a hundred million USD for my companies. After I finally did do a deal, it was with a consortium that owns widely disparate businesses globally. This company may partially be bought out this week. In the end, supply and demand runs businesses and my leadership is my ability to keep my vision while distracted by pickpockets.

I am a tough cookie who keeps his word to stop ID theft using my patent number is US 6,598.031 B1 to Mr. Jeffrey Ice, Inventor, for "APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ROUTING ENCRYPTED TRANSACTION CARD IDENTIFYING DATA THROUGH A PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK" i.e. Internet, phones or any electronic medium in the U. S. of A.

I trust the CEC Charities to be professional. The reason I did not sell majority control was I cannot get a promise to protect my endowments if I did sell out. So, my charities and I are stuck together for a long time. A smart review of their own memos and facts proves my story is the only explanation of all these litigations and facts.