Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

Rupert Goodwins

View blog's RSS Feed

Mixed Signals

Any sufficiently advanced information is indistinguishable from noise

Tuesday 19 June 2007, 6:06 PM

More madness from north of the border

Posted by Rupert Goodwins

What IS going on in Scotland? According to the Sunday Herald, the Scottish Qualifications Authority -- which sets the curricula for non-degree further education -- is seriously considering making intelligent design taught on a par with evolutionary science.

""The Sunday Herald has learned that the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) is considering provision for the theory as part of a review of the science course curriculum.

Intelligent design (ID) is one of a wide range of theories of origin currently taught as part of the Religious, Moral and Philosophy Studies (RMPS) SQA course, but could be moved elsewhere as part of the review. A spokesman for the SQA said: "It happens to sit in RMPS just now. If and when it does becomes part of the curriculum for science, which it may well do as part of this review, then that's where it could sit.""

Whut? Nobody just decides to do that - ID is a religious idea, creationism warmed up with no added science, as a recent court case in the US has comprehensively shown. Even in America, ID's natural home and the place where it's politically acceptable to be a science-denying religious bigot, it's getting nowhere (they recently asked all the Republican candidates for the presidency whether they believed in evolution. Three didn't. Imagine that in the UK). And now Scotland, the home of the Enlightenment, demonstrably the place where rationalism first swept superstition and supernatural nonsense out of power, is "reviewing" it? Someone somewhere has an agenda.

Deep strangeness. I do wonder if there's any connection with the recent appointment of Dr Janet Brown, who is an engineer/physicist who spent eighteen years in the US. It is a fascinating and informative fact that what support ID has among the intelligent is focussed among engineers, lawyers and mathematicians (not, you'll note, biologists) - and we could spent a happy few hours mulling that over. Or it could be that someone with a lot of money is leaning on the SQA - it's also a fascinating and informative fact that deeply conservative businessmen tend to like ID and wish to promote it.

Whatever, it isn't based on the science of ID. ID has no science.

That's not the only oddness one finds when looking through the website of the SQA with a skeptical eye. For example, there's the DIVA initiative, which is (and I quote), a "world class digtital collaboration to help young Scots". One trusts that development of a world class digtital spelling checker is high on the agenda.

And what is DIVA? Well...

"The trail blazer for the DIVA approach was a three year Memorandum of Understanding signed with Microsoft in 2004, which has enabled a publicly shared plan for incorporating elements of Microsoft courseware, resources and certifications into SQA framework in areas such as PC Passport. The approach trialled with Microsoft has led to the definition of a generic engagement and partnership framework which is now being applied to other world leading ICT and digital media vendors."

That's right - your state educational body is now building its vocational standards around Microsoft. It's not just Microsoft, of course - that wouldn't adequately reflect the rich, diverse world of IT or give students the range of experiences necessary to make good judgements when it comes to technology. No, as well as Microsoft there's CompTIA (no relation), Apple, Oracle, Cisco and Macromedia - all who won on a competitive tendering basis (well, you see, SQA has to be profitable. You think education's some sort of charity?).

They all get the chance to partake in "the development of new awards in ICT and digital media and expansion of existing awards, the inclusion of new learner support materials from industry into all levels of ICT and digital media education, the professional development opportunities for Scottish teachers and lecturers to train in the latest technologies and courses, and the development of learning pathways for new career opportunities in ICT and digital media industries, in line with the Scottish Credit and Qualification Framework (SCQF)."

Lovely. Oracle, Microsoft, Apple: couldn't think of better hands guiding our next generation of IT professionals.

Comments on this post

Lindsay Fraser

Hi Rupert, I totally agree with you about ID . It's a shock to the system when people with untestable opinions try to pollute serious science with their belief structure. A theory is fine providing there is repeatable evidence to support the theory, and indeed at the same time, critisise it, or show the limitations of the investigation. From what I have seen of ID, they take the bits they like and ignore quite obvious counter-argument. For me, ID as a "truth" has no business being associated with science. It seems to me that some individuals just cannot accept that we are here because we can be. One ID nut actually referred to evolutionary theory as "that rubbish." I just laughed at him. What else could I do? What worries me is you cannot "argue" with belief, you either accept it or you reject it. and what is science based on? Healthy argument and an enquiring mind. Take that skill away from kids and what do you get?
Linds

Posted by Lindsay Fraser on Jun 20, 2007 8:02 PM

67435

Working within local government in Scotland I have to say none of this surprises me anymore. There is a consistent erosion of serious discussion and thought in developing strategy and delivery mechanisms and an undue compliance with whatever way the wind is currently blowing.

To be honest it is anachronism that we even have a specific place for Religious education when we have seen a threat to the teaching of history as a stand alone subject on account of the potential to teach it within the remit of other subjects (foreign languages etc). Give the same perspective to religion and the fears are of a massive outcry from the churches that carry greater influence than attendance or membership merits.

Lets take the flip side and consider what would happen if we were to teach the range of sciences alongside religion and as part of this look at the probability that there is and has never been a supernatural "creator". Instant hanging and flogging!

As Rupert has so eloquently identified this mindset stretches across Scottish society and the education agenda. We have moved far from a country of the Enlightenment to a country of the craven establishment toady, hence the adherance to all things Microsoft as the dominant (and richest) member of the IT establishment. The old sayings hold firm "No one ever got sacked for...."

Posted by 67435 on Jun 21, 2007 12:15 PM

Rupert Goodwins
  • Rupert Goodwins
  • Location, location, location
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

My Blog Archive


Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 3,130

roger andre roger andre

Murdoch versus the Net? Game on.

Tuesday 10 November 2009, 6:40 PM

5 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

The time it takes

Tuesday 10 November 2009, 3:31 PM

1 comment

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 18


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters