Tuesday 27 November 2007, 9:03 PM
If It Ain't Broke.....
There's never a reason to overclock, if everything already works as fast or as well as you need. On the other hand, there's no such thing as too fast. Not in computing, anyway ;)
There are lots of ways to overclock, but I have found, (using a BIOS that allows it) increasing voltage on both processor & RAM, with an increase of clock speed applied to the processor, gives good results. Today, I did just that. I upped the cpu voltage from 1.4v to 1.5v, the RAM by +0.2v & increased the cpu clock speed from 200 to 210. This raised the processor's speed from 3.2Ghz to 3.36Ghz. My new benchmark best is, as of today, 43,455.
If you're new to overclocking, I strongly suggest only small increments, as hardware can be damaged if you apply too much. Also, use components specifically designed for overclocking. One company who makes these, is OCZ.
Benchmarking is not the only test for overclocking, but provides a tangible score for comparisons.
By far, the best test of overclocking is using your PC as you normally would. If there is a noticeable, positive difference in performance &, after a lengthy period of time (24-72 hours) it is still stable*, then it has worked.
* Stability means no blue screens, or difficulty booting up.
Check to see that your system is still being cooled efficiently by: 1. Put your hand near your power supply, at the back of your case & feel the air blowing out. (It should be warm, but not hot.) or 2. Monitor temperature levels in BIOS/CMOS (if you don't already have a desktop program for that).
Another sign of instability can be programs failing to load as expected, or images appearing fractured/pixelated.
Overclocking is dangerous, particularly if you're new to it, but can be rewarding if you've reached the very limit of upgrades that you can afford, or are available.
Comments on this post
It's funny I only recently asked someone why they are overclocking.
I've never been one to overclock. I idea behind is understandable but I fail to see why squeezing a bit more out of a machine while effectively reducing the expected life-span is a goal to aim for.
In addition to that, I'd hate to give overclocked PC components to friends or family, knowing that pushing isn't going to to much for the life expectancy. (Yes, my ex-pc parts tend to end up as part of an upgrade to someone I know).
Benchmarking can be a good test of system stability, yet i've found that at times there is nothing that can match the testing that occurs when playing a game. The resulting combination of elements in action, can cause BSODs that don't appear in benchmarking.
But I agree with the poster, be careful if you plan to overclock, it's a dangerous game to play with costly hardware.
I agree with Welshtroll; in our day to day computer usage we never use our processors to their full capacity, mainly due to other factors i.e. the software, RAM, OS or hosts' server in cases of downloads.. unless the processor is slower than 1GHZ there's really no advantage in cloaking.


