ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Become a ZDNet.co.uk member

Tom Espiner

View blog's RSS Feed

Security Bullet In

Communiques from the security front, sir

Thursday 13 December 2007, 3:21 PM

US government censors Wikipedia?

Posted by Tom Espiner

The US Government has been accused of meddling with Wikipedia entries.

According to an article in The Inquirer, a computer using an IP address attributed to the US House of Representatives was used to edit a Wikipedia entry on the invasion of Iraq. It was a Bush-friendly attempt to muddy the waters over the controversial question of whether Saddam had access to weapons of mass destruction, and to try to establish a link between the Iraq regime and al-Qaeda, according to the article.

This chimes with another piece on leaked-document site Wikileaks, in which the US military at Guantanamo Bay was accused of "deleting detainee ID numbers from Wikipedia last month, the systematic posting of unattributed "self praise" comments on news organization web sites in response to negative press, boosting pro-Guantanamo stories on the internet news site Digg and even modifying Fidel Castro's encyclopedia article to describe the Cuban president as "an admitted transexual" [sic]."

All I can say is that both sound feasible - the US government and military would want to control perceptions of its actions, especially when those actions are highly suspect. The whole WMD argument was laughable from the beginning, as were the supposed links the Iraqis had to al-Qaeda. Altering a Wikipedia entry for propaganda purposes would be fairly easy, as in theory anyone can edit the online encyclopaedia.


Comments on this post

welshtroll

Controlling the web 2.0

Thats some interesting news, especially the alleged Digg vote fixing.

On the matter of wikipedia, I wondered if it every occured to them, that the "history tab" link at the top of a Wiki page doesn't related to historical world events, but the history of that wiki page and highlights and logs all changes made.

Creates a very interesting question about the web 2.0 arena. If a large group were to actively poison community driven content what would be the impact and repercustions, on a local and global scale?

How many people read those site per day and how many would believe?

Posted by welshtroll on Dec 13, 2007 3:59 PM

corax

That people modify Wikipedia articles to suit their own agenda is old news. This article however seems to have more to do with the author's political biases than anything else. Not only people in favor of Bush administration policies edit online resources - President Bush's political adversaries do the same thing, but you mention nothing about them. Your political bias is especially evident in your statements about WMDs, which has nothing whatsoever to do with the subject of Wikipedia tampering.

Posted by corax on Dec 15, 2007 5:20 PM

Tom Espiner
  • Tom Espiner
  • London, UK
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

Contacts

Number of Contacts: 1

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 381

roger andre roger andre

Beware Of Sneaky Services

Sunday 6 July 2008, 1:27 AM

7 comments
roger andre roger andre

Beware Of Sneaky Services

Thursday 3 July 2008, 7:18 PM

7 comments
roger andre roger andre

facebook lockdown

Thursday 3 July 2008, 1:47 PM

3 comments
roger andre roger andre

Beware Of Sneaky Services

Thursday 3 July 2008, 1:38 PM

7 comments

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 1