ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Join the ZDNet.co.uk community

Charles McLellan

View blog's RSS Feed

Product Central

Dispatches from the Reviews Editor's desk

Tuesday 12 February 2008, 10:22 AM

Let laptop battle commence

Posted by Charles McLellan

Our collection of small, inexpensive, education-orientated notebooks is at last complete, following the arrival today of a brace of Intel Classmate systems. The Classmate will go up against the OLPC XO and ASUS's Eee in our low-power computing project.

Intel Classmate laptops

First impressions of the sturdy, blue-clad Classmate are of a more traditional notebook than the XO: their screens are of similar size at 7in. and 7.5in. respectively, and both use solid state storage, but the Classmate runs Windows XP rather than Linux and has a standard, if small, keyboard. The Classmate also has an RJ-45 Ethernet port as well as Wi-Fi, whereas the XO relies solely on Wi-Fi and mesh networking for connectivity.

Battery life will be an interesting comparison. Our tests with the XO so far show it delivering between 3.5 and 4 hours with the backlight on full and between 4.5 and 5 hours in 'ebook' mode (with the backlight off).

This weekend I let a pair of real children (mine), aged 12 and 14, loose with a brace of XOs. They were utterly unfazed by the Linux OS and its idiosyncratic user interface (for their sins, they're used to Windows), quickly getting to grips with the idea of shared activities over the mesh network. They were concerned whether 'teacher' would be able to eavesdrop on inter-pupil chat sessions (will have to check that), and even liked the much-maligned (by fat-fingered adults) keyboard.

Stay tuned for more testing bulletins, and our final report.


Comments on this post

1000030281

The OLPC's screen is actually 7.5", larger than the Classmate.

Posted by 1000030281 on Feb 12, 2008 8:26 PM

Charles McLellan

You're quite right re the screens of course; correction now made.

Posted by Charles McLellan on Feb 13, 2008 9:25 AM

David Long

Although performance is not the main purpose of these systems I would still like to know how their compare on that front. Even just the under-the-hood specs comparision would be nice.

Looks-wise the Asus Eee looks to be streets a head and the Intel offering bring up the rear with the cross between a v-tech child laptop and what I'd imagine commodore would have made in the 1980s if they wanted to make a portable version of their commodore 64.

Updated by David Long on Feb 18, 2008 12:15 PM