Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

David Meyer

View blog's RSS Feed

Communication Breakdown

Communications from the world of, er, communications. And other stuff.

Friday 20 June 2008, 5:00 PM

Will Microsoft ever stop selling XP?

Posted by David Meyer

While writing up the release details of Asus' Eee Box today, it took me a moment to twig that the machine was slightly odd. Why? Because it's coming out in August, it'll be using Windows XP and it's a desktop PC. Microsoft had set June 30 as the cut-off date for XP sales, except for "netbooks" like the mobile Eee PC - how come a desktop is going to be available with the OS after that cut-off date?

The answer is self-evident: the Eee Box's innards are very similar to those of, say, the upcoming Eee PC 1000 - both use the low-powered Atom processor, for example - and it simply can't handle Vista. But, I asked Microsoft, surely the XP extension was only for netbooks...

Not so, says Microsoft. Didn't I see that press release that came out on June 3, in which they said XP would continue to be available on "nettops" like the Eee Box? Well, no, I didn't, nor had anyone in the office. Onto the intarwebs though, and there it is.

I can see why I missed it the first time. Here's the title: "Following Success of Windows on Netbooks, Microsoft Extends Windows Offering to Nettop Devices". And on it goes, for almost 600 words, with almost no mention of the name "XP" (it is in there once, towards the bottom, buried in a quote from Cellnet's general manager). So, here's the deal: Microsoft is killing off XP for desktops, except for desktops that are - and this really is the sole criterion - "ultralow-cost". Bearing in mind that this is going to be an exploding market, that means Microsoft isn't really killing off XP at all, much as it would love to.

"The company is seeing much demand among industry partners who want to ensure that customers can have the benefits of Windows on both new and existing devices," says the release. Indeed.

Comments on this post

Moley

Isn't it obvious? This decision is necessary in order to compete with Linux on these emerging low cost, low powered and convenient devices. MS had no choice unless they were going to withdraw and leave this part of the market entirely to Linux. It's a "no brainer", as they say.

Updated by Moley on Jun 24, 2008 10:38 AM

David Meyer

It is indeed a no-brainer, but somewhat embarrassing for Microsoft! Especially as many of these manufacturers are only begrudgingly sticking XP on these devices - they truly loves the Linux! You gotta laugh...

Updated by David Meyer on Jun 23, 2008 11:00 AM

David Meyer
  • David Meyer
  • London, UK
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 2,300

Jake Rayson Jake Rayson

You mean Ubuntu isn't perfect?!?

Friday 6 November 2009, 3:44 PM

2 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Did not say it was.

Friday 6 November 2009, 2:13 PM

15 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Human error can be avoided.

Friday 6 November 2009, 1:49 PM

3 comments
manek manek

Email archiving - who needs it?

Friday 6 November 2009, 10:24 AM

5 comments

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 11


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters