Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

Rupert Goodwins

View blog's RSS Feed

Mixed Signals

Any sufficiently advanced information is indistinguishable from noise

Thursday 30 October 2008, 3:23 PM

LHC - what actually happens when superconducting magnets go wrong...

Posted by Rupert Goodwins

I came across a very interesting explanation of what actually happens in an incident such as the one which felled the LHC, from Vern Paxson, vern@icir.org. He worked on software for the 1980s big science experiment, the Superconducting Super Collider - and has kindly allowed me to quote his description of what the "bad electrical connection" actually was. Over to you, Vern!

"Bad electrical connection" is a layman's explanation of what accelerator physicists refer to as a "quench". This is in fact a routine event when working with superconducting magnets: somewhere something in the winding is imperfect, such that, when under the influence of extremely high magnetic fields, there is physical motion in the magnet's wire, leading to friction.

The friction generates local heat which transitions a small amount of wire from superconducting to "normal". The magnets carry such immense currents that the small resistance of the normal wire turns into a large amount of local heat; this in turn *transitions more wires* from superconducting to normal; and the process spreads.

It all happens fast, with the risk of explosion.

To counter this threat, superconducting magnets have high-speed circuitry designed to detect the onset of quench events. When detected, they very rapidly (and counter-intuitively) heat up the entire magnet, causing it *all* to go normal. The goal of doing so is that while individual wires can't possibly bear (when normal) the heat of the amperage going through them, the entire magnet has enough bulk volume to do so.

When a superconducting magnet is first commissioned, it undergoes "training", in which it is repeatedly (1) powered up to the point of quenching, (2) the quench-protection circuitry kicks in, (3) the whole thing goes normal and thus doesn't explode ... and (4) the imperfect winding that moved due to the high magnetic field is now in a new position where it likely won't move again (since the original motion was driving it towards such a potential-energy minima). Therefore, that particular quench won't recur. However, others might. So during training, you do this again and again until no more quenches occur.

So, Yes, such failures are expected, but in this case something went wrong with the quench-protection mechanism leading to the explosion. A bit more than just "a poor solder connection" (though clearly still not good, and I believe magnets are generally trained *before* installing them in the beam tunnel).

Vern


(Explanation/disclaimer: this is all from memory rooted in my former life doing software for the Superconducting Super Collider back in the 1980s.)


Comments on this post

Rupert Goodwins
  • Rupert Goodwins
  • Location, location, location
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

My Blog Archive


Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 3,260

J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Microsoft Loses Patent Case Appeal

Thursday 24 December 2009, 3:37 PM

5 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Microsoft Loses Patent Case Appeal

Thursday 24 December 2009, 6:47 AM

5 comments
ator1940 ator1940

AOL's Steve Case

Wednesday 23 December 2009, 12:31 PM

1 comment

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 18

Avatar David Meyer

Android passes 20,000 apps mark

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 5:05 PM

0 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters