Monday 24 November 2008, 9:15 AM
Giving us the finger
But it hasn't got a name: the little icon of the pointing hand. If you can't immediately visualise it, hover your pointer over the tabs at the top of this page. Of course you know it - but what is it called?
It turns out that it isn't called anything. Or, rather, there's a multiplicity of names and no particular agreement. This is unusual - most typographical devices, beloved as they are of the more pedantic and rigorous, have long since been categorised: ¶ is a pilcrow, for example.
But nobody speaks to the hand. I know this, as I know about pilcrows, thanks to the ever delightful Languagehat blog, which has just brought the matter to our attention.
The best candidate for the fingering hand, by the way, is manicule - apparently in use in other languages, but mysteriously yet to become established in English. Lots more about this on LH, and I warmly encourage everyone to use this fine word at every possible opportunity.
Now, what's the correct term for a manicule with two fingers prominent...
Comments on this post
I feel sure I've seen one in a giant and ancient annotated Gospel commentary in the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge.
I remember the page was something like 800 years old, and had multiple layers of commentary by different Church Fathers, often interleaved as word balloons in different colours, emitted by hovering figures.
The whole thing was like a funkier comic-book version of today's hypertext.
(And elsewhere in the exhibition was a Bible that may have belonged to Bede)
There's probably some Egyptian carving with a group of Ra worshippers wearing giant foam "We're #1' manicules just before they go to smite the Babylonians.


