Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

Andrew Donoghue

View blog's RSS Feed

Triplesourced

Reporting, musing and not to mention some random scribbling on tech issues from green/sustainable IT to security. (http://adonoghue.wordpress.com/)

Wednesday 21 January 2009, 9:18 AM

Is Bill's philanthropy just another form of control?

Posted by Andrew Donoghue

On a flight back from LA last week I found myself in that brain limbo that too much air travel can impose. Too wired to sleep but too tired to sit through a whole movie so breaking with my normal obsessive need to watch all the new movies on the plane I opted for some TV and chanced on the BBC Money Programme Interview with Bill Gates which aired last June.

I missed it at the time, probably consciously expecting it to be more glossed over mainstream coverage of Bill. For the most part it was exactly what I expected with presenter Fiona Bruce steering clear of asking Bill too many of the tough questions despite claiming that it had taken the Beeb almost two years of negotiations with Microsoft to secure the interview. The programme delved into the history of MS and went over the usual ground and then tackled Bill's new philanthropic career.

Various talking heads popped up around the issue including US tech journo and super-geek Robert X Cringely who basically claimed that Bill's latest venture is all about securing a nobel peace prize! Well that makes sense but then thinking about another aspect of philanthropy, the tax saving, it struck me that while it might seem on one hand that Bill is being supremely altruistic with giving away billions the fact is that he has to to do that anyway through taxation. So by setting up this huge philanthropic effort he is able to take back some control of that vast chunk of cash that he was previously sending off to the US Treasury and Bill likes control.

I am sure that there is a lot of genuine altruism here but people don't really change that much. The single-minded focus on achieving a goal has characterised Microsoft's rise to to top and the fact that Gates would suddenly shift gift and become some touchy-feely Mother Teresa-like figure just doesn't wash. There is a plan here with a definite end-game, probably the nobel peace prize, with the handy by-product of being able to have more say over the vast swathes of tax dollars.

Gates wasn't given a completely free-ride by the BBC, the parting segment had Fiona Bruce being shown around the MS Campus by Gates. The pair came up against what seemed to be a locked door. Gates assumed that the door was secured by the high-tech security system and search vainly for his swipe card before resigning himself to calling for help. After credulously asking if Bill was locked out of his own building, the BBC presenter simply leant on the door and strolled in. And neat little segment that said it all really.

Comments on this post

knapper

So let me get this straight, you start off by complaining that the BBC didn't have the journalistic integrity to ask the hard questions. Then you write some idle speculation attacking someone's motives for doing good work, simply because you don't like them. I don't know how important the various motivations behind Gate's charity work are, neither do you. Certainly it's not all about just wanting to help those in need, but to imply as a fact that simple philanthropic motivations are not the primary reason is a reflection on the individuals themselves, including you, not him.

Posted by knapper on Jan 21, 2009 12:44 PM

Andrew Donoghue

If you are saying that my opinion is purely opinion - then I completely agree with you. You are right that I cannot know the inner-workings of Bill Gates mind but I don't claim to. The man is doing a lot of good work and making an big difference to people's lives for sure. I am just saying that in one way philanthropy is not purely giving - because of the tax discounts involved it gives some measure of control back to the donor and control is a characteristic that has dominated Gates career to date. And no, that is not a fact, it's an opinion, a thought and nothing more.

Posted by Andrew Donoghue on Jan 21, 2009 12:56 PM

knapper

What I don't understand then is this, what is the point you're trying to make?

“I am just saying that in one way philanthropy is not purely giving”

Very true, but philanthropy is not altruistic. Any philanthropy is about being in control, about doing things that you benefit from, even if it's just satisfying your own desires, no matter who the individual is. You're right to say “philanthropy is not purely giving”. The point is, it never is, no matter who the individual is. I really don't see why you have singled out Gates and suggested that there is some special significance to him as a philanthropist and control, “a characteristic that has dominated Gates career to date.” as you put it. Every philanthropist could be said to have that characteristic.

Posted by knapper on Jan 21, 2009 8:43 PM

Andrew Donoghue

This member is ranked #20 in our top 100

  • Andrew Donoghue
  • London
  • Member since: October 2006

Site Activity Rating 4

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 2,478

ator1940 ator1940

"polished Moblin"

Monday 9 November 2009, 1:32 PM

2 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Did not say it was.

Friday 6 November 2009, 2:13 PM

15 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Human error can be avoided.

Friday 6 November 2009, 1:49 PM

3 comments

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 12


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters