Tuesday 17 February 2009, 3:49 PM
Ballmer praises openness, attacks iPhone
Ballmer was participating in a Mobile World Congress panel discussion on the "open mobile ecosystem", alongside Nokia chief Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo and AT&T head Ralph de la Vega, who used the occasion to inadvertently announce Dell's imminent smartphone.
"Open means different things to different people," Ballmer said. "To some people, open means open source. It means more than that and different than that to me. Open can mean an open platform that people can extend, or it can mean open standards that are baked in. Ultimately the companies that succeed will be open, maybe in different ways and at different times."
To Ballmer, "open" refers to "the power and success of the partner ecosystem approach [that Microsoft] pioneered at the beginning of the PC revolution".
"The industry makes about $18 for every $1 Microsoft makes through the Windows platform," he said.
"We had to strike a pragmatic balance between a very unstructured openness in which privacy and security are difficult to control, and the other end [where there is] much less choice, less flexibility but often less chaos and many fewer problems."
"In the mobile space, the proportion of revenue that goes to the ecosystem is even higher than that in the PC ecosystem," Ballmer continued. "This is the right approach. We support open networks, open competition and open access . We've doubled down on the level of interoperability that you see in our PC ecosystems."
Then came a spot of iPhone-related complaining, with de la Vega claiming Apple's handset would be even more successful "if there was commonality about where the applications could work".
"The iPhone has a nice app platform," Ballmer said. "People are downloading. But most of these are really front-ends to websites."
Microsoft announced its own mobile application marketplace on Monday, although details remain sketchy.
Ballmer then pointed out that, with the iPhone, "you can only get it from one hardware maker, with their choices and their price points". He contrasted this with the approach of Windows Mobile and Symbian, both of which allow the operating system to run on a variety of different handsets.
Comments on this post
Talk about stating the obvious! That's Apple and that's what Apple do. It's their company and people who don't want that don't have to buy or if your a big tech firm be involved with the platform.
I can see the logic behind Apple locking down their platforms. Just look at what happens to windows when you add all the rubbish that ships with todays PCs. I've found that with a clean install windows is highly stable. The proofs in the pudding.
You will not convince me that this gem of loud mastication, equivocation and nonsense,
"To some people, open means open source. It means more than that and different than that to me. Open can mean an open platform that people can extend, or it can mean open standards that are baked in. Ultimately the companies that succeed will be open, maybe in different ways and at different times,"
was not written by the staffs of either MadTV or Sat. Night Live.
Has Ballmer been taking language lessons from Bill Clinton?
Y'all are being mean to poor old Steve. To him open is like Windows, anyone can hack in and steal your information, or add-delete files from your hard drive.


