Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

Rupert Goodwins

View blog's RSS Feed

Mixed Signals

Any sufficiently advanced information is indistinguishable from noise

Thursday 5 March 2009, 4:43 PM

Microsoft's secret plan behind the TomTom suit?

Posted by Rupert Goodwins

A very interesting analysis of the Microsoft versus TomTom suit has appeared on veteran journo Glyn Moody's blog. Having established that Microsoft's "it's not about Linux" schtick is transparently wrong - the area covered by the FAT patents is pure Linux, unchanged by TomTom, so any Linux distro with FAT compatibility would qualify - we then get a post from Jeremy Allison, who's a big cheese at samba.org and thus well versed in Microsoft's approach to open source.

You must read the whole thing yourself - but in brief, he says that Microsoft has been putting all its IP deals under NDA because the cross-licensing of patents is disallowed under Section 7 of GPL 2. Thus, anyone who signs is disallowed from distributing any of the Linux kernel - so Microsoft has them over a barrel.

This explains the secrecy behind all the deals - which, lest we forget, Microsoft is promoting as examples of open sharing - and is building up to a situation where Microsoft can detonate a huge improvised explosive device under Linux.

What might save things is if TomTom prevails, negating the relevant patents - and there are good reasons to think it would, if it can afford to fight. If it can't afford to fight, then things get just that little nastier. As Allison says:

"Tom Tom are the first company to publicly refuse to engage in this ugly little protection racket, and so they got sued. Had Tom Tom silently agreed to violate the GPL, as so many others have, then we'd only hear about a vague "patent cross licensing deal" just like the ones Microsoft announces with other companies.

Make no mistake, this is intended to force Tom Tom to violate the GPL, or change to Microsoft embedded software."

Comments on this post

Moley

It is indeed surprising that Microshaft's secret dealings have not been leaked before.

I, for one, do not like Microshaft's duplicity and double dealing and do not want to be 'owned' by them. Neither do I want to live in a constant state of suspicion, thinking or fearing the worst of people, all the time. Unfortunately .........

Time to remove Windows 7 which had been growing on me, and to think that I had been planning another positive post.

Separately, we are reading that the EU have decided that they can relax their supervision of said Microshaft when, without this belated revelation, they still seem to be using (abusing) their dominant monopoly to extend dependence on their products.

Correct me if I'm wrong, if this latest revelation is true, then Microshaft may have deal a damaging blow to the GPL.

Tom Tom are not well placed financially to defend this action. Notwithstanding that they are not a community player, they are going to need some considerable assistance if they are not going to cave in. Groklaw to the rescue!

By the way, where are Red Hat placed following their recently reported secret deal.

I've said it before, in many contexts, and I'll say it again. I would like to leave a decent world to my children and grand children. Without being too pessimistic, that seems to be rather optimistic.



Posted by Moley on Mar 5, 2009 9:50 PM

ator1940

How sad for a company like MS to sink so low to get rid of competition. But, you have to agree, they have done so many dirty deals before and not owned up till caught red handed. One day they will get their just reward.

Posted by ator1940 on Mar 6, 2009 8:01 AM

John Molloy

@ator

Market Cap at 135 billion and falling, yep, I'd say that reward is coming.

Posted by John Molloy on Mar 7, 2009 4:25 PM

johnyk_vl

This comment has been deleted at the users request

Updated by johnyk_vl on Mar 13, 2009 9:27 AM

Rupert Goodwins
  • Rupert Goodwins
  • Location, location, location
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

My Blog Archive


Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 3,233

Shibley R Shibley R

Omission of certain fundamentals

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 9:30 PM

2 comments
Shibley R Shibley R

Wouldn't it be ironic?

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 9:24 PM

2 comments

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 18

Avatar David Meyer

Android passes 20,000 apps mark

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 5:05 PM

0 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters