Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

Rupert Goodwins

View blog's RSS Feed

Mixed Signals

Any sufficiently advanced information is indistinguishable from noise

Monday 24 August 2009, 9:39 PM

xG opens its doors, closes its mouth

Posted by Rupert Goodwins

I've not written about my old Floridian muckers in xG Technology for a while, because there's not been anything to write about. That's changed.

There have been press releases and intense online acrimony, true, but those have been indistinguishable from previous press releases and prior intense online acrimony. Evidence for the company's claims - that it's created a breakthrough wireless data technology that can operate without interference on interference-ridden public radio spectrum, with far lower power requirements and superior performance to any other - has been no more available to date than before. Which is to say, not at all.

You may remember that my previous attempts to find out what was going on foundered on the company's insistence on my signing a non-disclosure agreement before telling me anything substantial. Not much good to a journalist, that. And while I did have a number of people feeding me behind-the-scenes gossip, they were all anonymous and uncheckable, and that's not much good to a journalist either. I lack the elite skills that can turn such stuff into gold; give me a chunk of sparkly stuff and I can perhaps tell iron pyrites from the real thing, but I'm no good at that trick when the specimen is kept behind a veil.

So I am extremely happy to report that there's a new press release from xG that differs from previous ones in two important ways. One is interesting but not by itself of much use; the other is more intriguing.

On the face of it, the press release seems to directly address the biggest bugbear, that nobody's been allowed to get their mitts on the goodies without being bound hand and foot to the xG corporate machine. Now, the company says, "xG Technology is opening its lab facilities in Sunrise, Florida to media and analysts in order to preview its new technology."

Which is great, assuming that you can get to Sunrise, Florida, that you're allowed to carry out the sort of evaluation that can tell you something useful, and that you can write about it as you see fit. I can't drop by, but doubtless there are journalists over there who can (if that's you, please get in touch: we should talk. I'll be delighted to share everything I have, and all I ask is you make good use of it). The rest - well, I just can't tell from the press release what the details of the open labs are. I'm happy to assume that open means what it says, and that visitors will be allowed to do and write what they like.

What's more interesting, though, is what the press release doesn't say. There are two reasons advanced why xG is a good idea:


* xMax transmits over unlicensed spectrum—the same as baby monitors and cordless phones. Major national cellular carriers paid billions of dollars for licensed spectrum that they recoup from customers.

* xMax was built as a totally Internet-based digital system from top to bottom—an extremely cost efficient communication approach.


Of the claimed breakthrough core technology, the 'Flash Signal' modulation method, there is no mention. You can still find it talked about on xG's own website, as well as on other sites where it's roundly attacked as basically unworkable, but there's no promise in the press release that what you'll see in Sunrise, Florida, will actually use it.

An odd omission. If, as I suspect, the current technology uses more mainstream methods, then it's very questionable that they'll be able to cope with the jungle of unlicensed spectrum any better than anyone else.

As always - and for the better part of a decade now - I'll just have to reserve judgement until some actual facts appear.

Comments on this post

KA9Q

Unlicensed spectrum? Internet-based?

Sounds like WiFi to me. I can get it for what? $50 at the local computer store?

Posted by KA9Q on Aug 25, 2009 11:16 AM

KA9Q

This comment has been deleted at the users request

Updated by KA9Q on Aug 25, 2009 11:21 AM

HuangDongh

What we have here is interesting for two reasons:

1. xG has been lying to the market for years about their technology and that's now confirmed. Shouldn't they be sued for this?
2. xG has nothing whatsoever that is of interest to anyone

This company is a very sad story

Posted by HuangDongh on Aug 25, 2009 12:47 PM

Rupert Goodwins
  • Rupert Goodwins
  • Location, location, location
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

My Blog Archive


Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 3,259

J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Microsoft Loses Patent Case Appeal

Thursday 24 December 2009, 3:37 PM

5 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Microsoft Loses Patent Case Appeal

Thursday 24 December 2009, 6:47 AM

5 comments
ator1940 ator1940

AOL's Steve Case

Wednesday 23 December 2009, 12:31 PM

1 comment
Shibley R Shibley R

Good news!!

Wednesday 23 December 2009, 10:19 AM

1 comment

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 18

Avatar David Meyer

Android passes 20,000 apps mark

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 5:05 PM

0 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters