Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

David Meyer

View blog's RSS Feed

Communication Breakdown

Communications from the world of, er, communications. And other stuff.

Friday 18 September 2009, 5:05 PM

Social networking federation: why not use .tel?

Posted by David Meyer

An interesting and potentially useful feature of some recent handsets has been the integration of standard mobile phone contacts lists with the user's social networking contacts lists. The most notable propagators of this functionality have been manufacturers of Android handsets — in particular, HTC with its Sense user interface and Motorola with its Motoblur UI.

The basic idea is to be able to look up a contact and see not only their phone number, but also their latest Facebook status update and Twitter post. This kind of functionality is logical and indeed a Very Clever Idea given the rapidly changing nature of communication media.

However, there is a problem. Let's say you pick up the HTC Hero, which uses the Sense UI, and you want to integrate your friend's various online identities into one easy-to-peruse screen. You can do it, but you have to do it friend-by-friend. Many people have hundreds of phone contacts and hundreds of Facebook friends — it's an almighty schlep to match them all up.

The scenario becomes even less attractive when you consider that your next handset might come from another company, and you might have to go through the whole manufacturer-specific-integration thing again.

What is needed is some kind of federated identity scheme. Yes, I know, there are plenty out there (and none have taken off in any significant way), but there is one in particular that is just begging to be used for the federation of social networking personae: .tel.

The top level domain, which launched last year, is unique among TLDs in that it does not automatically redirect the web surfer anywhere — instead, it uses the DNS itself as a repository for the registrant's basic contact details, including social networking profile links.

Why can't the social networking websites and the handset-makers all plug into this information? It's all very good to have this online business-card stuff, but let's face it, it's hardly going to be anyone's first port of call when looking up a contact. The searcher's mobile phone, however, will be their primary source of information.

Anyway, it's just a thought…

Comments on this post

CA

Yup a unified automated format would help a great deal like, but again this would also become a target.

Updated by CA on Sep 19, 2009 12:42 AM

plaggypig

Exactly :-)

There is some ongoing discussion about using .tel for the namespace within a decentralised microblogging architecture (www.scripting.com, www.rsscloud.org). The idea is simple: news aggregators resolve peoples names to their real-time RSS feeds.

As a bonus companies like Twitter and Facebook could create ancillary and recurring revenue streams by up-selling .tel names. BT just started running a .tel commercial on TV in the UK (www.bt.com/tel).

I believe we'll see other massively disruptive .tel applications across the entire spectrum of communication.

My .tel on the web:
http://andy.tel/

Or see the real McCoy:
$ dig andy.tel NAPTR

Updated by plaggypig on Sep 21, 2009 10:00 AM

David Meyer
  • David Meyer
  • London, UK
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 2,381

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 11

Avatar Tom Espiner

McKinnon lawyers seek judicial review

Thursday 10 December 2009, 5:00 PM

1 comment

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters