Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

David Meyer

View blog's RSS Feed

Communication Breakdown

Communications from the world of, er, communications. And other stuff.

Thursday 15 October 2009, 4:07 PM

Gov't confusion over national 2Mbps commitment

Posted by David Meyer

Confusion has broken out within government circles over the 2Mbps universal broadband coverage that was called for by Stephen Carter's Digital Britain report.

At a Parliament and Internet conference held in London on Thursday, the head of broadband policy for Lord Mandelson's Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) said the government had "never said there will be 2Mbps [provided to UK citizens] at any given time".

Andy Carter (no relation to Stephen, Lord Carter) said in a discussion session that Digital Britain had called for broadband speeds of up-to-2Mbps to be instituted across the country, and that 2Mbps was not a minimum requirement of the strategy.

"This is not an obligation," Andy Carter said. "This is the government recognising that services are not available [in certain areas of the country] and it is an attempt to correct that."

However, communications minister Stephen Timms — Lord Carter's successor — then arrived to address all the delegates at the conference. Asked to clarify the significance of Digital Britain's 2Mbps references, Timms said 2Mbps was "a minimum basic level of service, a safety net".

"It will be the universal service obligation and I feel confident that we will be able to ensure that 2Mbps is available everywhere," Timms said.

Later in the conference, Derek Wyatt MP — the head of the All-Party Communications Group (apComm) — praised Timms for saying the universal service obligation would ensure minimum speeds of 2Mbps across the country.

"I was encouraged that he was brave enough to say that," Wyatt said. "That's what we want."

When Digital Britain came out in July, the government said the universal service obligation would be funded at least in part by money that had been set aside for the digital switchover, but not yet spent.

The government has maintained a stance of technology neutrality on the rollout, saying it could be met by a combination of fixed-line, wireless and/or satellite services.

Comments on this post

Andrew Donoghue

Very amusing too see government stumbling over a measly 2Mpbs by 2012 when countries such as Finland have already committed to 100Mbps by 2015...seems Monty Python got it right when they sang "Finland, Finland, Finland, the country where I quite want to be".

Posted by Andrew Donoghue on Oct 16, 2009 10:28 AM

David Meyer
  • David Meyer
  • London, UK
  • Member since: October 2006
ZDNet Staff

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 2,343

ator1940 ator1940

In Redmondian talk

Monday 23 November 2009, 2:10 PM

2 comments
manek manek

IPv6: don't be so US-centric

Friday 20 November 2009, 6:12 PM

3 comments
manek manek

Will we believe the telcos?

Friday 20 November 2009, 3:43 AM

8 comments

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 11

Avatar Jonathan Bennett

Did Microsoft violate the GPL?

Wednesday 11 November 2009, 10:19 AM

0 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters