Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

Jonathan Bennett

View blog's RSS Feed

Beyond the Code

or, how to win friends, influence people and make a living by writing open source software. It's not just about the code.

Follow me on Twitter as @jonobennett.

Monday 26 October 2009, 5:04 PM

CIO Jury returns the wrong verdict on open source

Posted by Jonathan Bennett

A recent silicon.com CIO jury has found that some CIOs don't believe open source software can help cut costs. The jury, composed of 12 CIOs from across a wide spectrum of UK businesses voted 10-2 against the idea that in these cash-strapped times, using open source software could cut your IT costs. The main sticking point, in the jury's eyes, was that there are hidden migration costs when switching to open source software, which means you still end up spending as much as with proprietary software. It's depressing to see people in charge of British IT being so spectacularly misinformed.

The first mistake the jury has made is blame any migration costs on the software you're moving to, not from. While any software migration will use up resources, this is as true of moving from one version of a proprietary package to another, as it is of moving from proprietary to open source. In bringing this argument up, the jury is admitting they've been caught by the proprietary software trap — exit costs.

Open source has no exit costs, because you never need to make an exit. As long as you have the source, you can fix bugs and adapt the software to your needs, or you can pay someone else to do it for you. If you don't like the service you're getting, you can go elsewhere. If only one company is allowed to make changes to the software you're using, and you don't think they're providing value for money, you're trapped.

The other mistake the jury makes is to think that even if there are no immediate cash savings to be had, open source isn't a better investment in the longer term. You can get discounts on proprietary software licences, but you'll still have to pay, and you'll have to do it more than once. When you spend money on open source software, you get to keep the results, so you're not just paying to use something that will be deliberately obsoleted in a few years, forcing you to pay for an upgrade.

Open source software isn't an instant fix that will instantly make more cash available in your company, but it will save you money, and it will make the money you do spend go further. It also makes you free to make your own decisions about suppliers. That's what will deliver real long-term savings.

Comments on this post

CA

How can they not see the longer term savings :s, well either that or they have being bought off. :O

Posted by CA on Oct 26, 2009 11:39 PM

Jonathan Bennett

This member is ranked #12 in our top 100

  • Jonathan Bennett
  • Applications Development, London
  • Member since: October 2006

Site Activity Rating 5

CoreTechs

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 1,969

Adrian Bridgwater Adrian Bridgwater

Whither Novell?

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 11:26 PM

1 comment

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 18

Avatar David Meyer

Android passes 20,000 apps mark

Tuesday 15 December 2009, 5:05 PM

0 comments
Avatar Tom Espiner

McKinnon lawyers seek judicial review

Thursday 10 December 2009, 5:00 PM

1 comment

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters