How Messers. Jeffrey Ice and Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari of IDPixie LLC saved Internet Commerce from online ID theft!

Part 6

As I reflect in my journal upon the previous parts, I see that to many the rationale for the Charitable Endowment Council, or CEC, and the various Charities I support may need clarification today. I would like to establish independence totally from any ilicit activity and go over the whys of my personal charitable activity. As a gift giver in the past, I want to set up a pattern and methodology for giving and endowment that is legal, ethical, logical and solves all problems regarding giving to Charities anywhere. I was advised by my counsels that a Federal Foundation which sets up charities in an unbrella can solve all issues and at the same time do lots of good in general. As a system, it is normal, regular and totally legal. So much so that it is used by church associations and other charities that have a similar issue but a local need for seperate charitable dispersion and use.

Personal Statement- part 6- A

I Abdul Taw’ala Ibn Ali Alishtari executed a number of Endowment affidavits on GPN Wholesale Direct Sales Consortium letterhead. This agency was a subsidiary of GlobalProtector.Net, Inc., AKA GPN. GPN was sold the next year to EDI Secure LLLP that became assigned and sold to IDPixie, LLC a year after that. All contracts and endowments were continued from one corporate entity to the next. In all these entities, I was the CEO although I never owned EDI Secure LLP or IDPixie, LLC.

This is an explanation of the forgiveness/settlement/endowment affidavit agreement line by line. I think a line by line explanation is best to not confuse anyone of even one word of it. If this does not relate to you, please skip, as this does not directly relate to ID theft save that beneficiaries of the charities have to indentify themselves to the Foundation setting it all up respectively.

The blank endowment affidavit seen in "Personal Statement- part 6-B records promises as facts. The “Wherefore” statement by myself says I owned company and intellectual property of value, present tense to that deal, not specifically refers to patents, but including all intellectual properties such as patents pending. Also, that I seek to do good things in the public domain.

Then, I resolve to fund many Charities. I did fund the Global Peace Film Festival, Inc., a known charity, publicly, which made me legally a philanthropist . I will do this in Washington DC under the US of A Foundations laws as agreed with CEC counsel of record for all Charity beneficiaries.

In addition, the “Wherefores” sets up a Charity Endowment Council, or "CEC", as an ad hoc unicorporated benevolent association, representing specified numbered Charity for beneficiaries who are party to affidavits by recognition and signing for Charity beneficiaries. That CEC is seeking an endowment for its participating beneficial charities. All charities are divided into either a family Charity or a community Charity of unrelated beneficiaries. No Charity can violate U. S. of A. Federal laws and any violation of U. S. Code is adverse to endowment funding. U. S. of A. federal rules require 4% placement on balance sums annually with a Charity and the rest can be used as Charity likes for beneficiaries, indeed including for profit uses if handled right.

Respective counsels to each CEC Charity must explain all law since any coverage here by me is cursory and only for general reference of my understanding of my rights and duties. It is not meant to be a legal opiinion or legal advice to any CEC Charity or beneficiary thereto.

Lastly, endowment is the will of myself, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, per se, and it is assignable to whomever is beneficary thereto through corporate inheritance even though I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, may no longer own the gifted assets personally pre-given as endowments per se.

The Bahamian lease forgiveness/settlement/endowment affidavit deal sets a Charity as a member of the CEC and it says I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, by my hand will do endowments from corpus profits pro rate to 1% net income for 20 years from start. This is why I kept control of management of IDPixie LLC since no one else feels the need, desire and/or the duty to fulfill my promises perfectly.

Article 1 sets the legal venue in Washington D.C., which domesticate U. S. of A. Charities.

Article 2 disallows a felon or a person of questionable character with misrepresentations or acts of lying, on record, to be a trustee.

Article 3 sets a U.S. of A. Federal authority under the Court of Congress since D.C. venue is that can arbitrate any disputes assuming the trustee cannot be challenged for any legal reason.

Article 4 means Charities will acknowledge that what is gifted is received with a receipt, which usually means showing a tax-exempt number on letterhead and other legal requirements to me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, or more properly to my Foundation counsels and assigns.

Article 5 is a forgiveness statement saying each CEC Charity and beneficiaries thereto has no other claim whatsoever save on what it is endowed as a gift, which means all other debts related to these Charitable beneficiaries of record, including The Bahamian leases, are written off as a loss and are therefore moot. Also, moot business should not be entertained for any discusion at all since it might lead to misunderstandings or worse, misrepresentations.

Article 6 indicates the nature of the CEC Charity is only and always non-profit, which is further proof of separation from any for-profit activity since the settlement is to set up a type of CEC Charity and not to pay income, fees or funds to any persons as a type of for-profit deal of any type. The moot debt and live gift are not related save by benevolence of beneficiaries on one part and by myself on the other part.

Article 7 is an agreement to set up a Charity, Charity Endowment Council, ostensibly since it doesn't say otherwise as an ad hoc unincorporated association, which will act as a billing agent to split the 1% of profits granted to the CEC Charities as a group split prorate or by number of charity numbers per se. Further clarifying, the Foundation gets 10% of IDPixie LLC net income and it gives 10% gross of that 10% net IDPixie LLC income which is 1% net of IDPixie LLC net income as a pass through to the CEC audit for distribution equally to all CEC Charities. The Foundation actually distributes it according to CEC audit respectively.

Article 8 limits endowment for 20 years from setting up of CEC Charities as negotiated by counsels. It was originally 10 years and agreed on 20 years. This is why the later the set up closer to profit the better for CEC Charities in terms of specific non-profit profitability.

Article 9 is an agreement to be trained, at my, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari’s, cost for travel and lodging, in D.C. using his D.C. counsels. This allows for a one-time good resolution and unified handling inside the U. S. of A. This also indicates that CEC Charities must identify trustees to me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, for handling timely.

Article 10 sets an equal amount for each number of endowment sums and that sum is a gift sum set by settlement in favor of endowment after forgiveness of all offshore leases per se. Each CEC Charity gets the same endowment sum gift amount.

Article 11 sets a multiplier as only one per Charity for sum of endowment so that CEC Charity number 2 and CEC Charity 120 are all for the same sum with no change in value.

Article 12 sets that Charity funds are unrelated to any for-profit activity anywhere by anyone for any reason and that it is therefore a stand-alone issue. Even though an U. S. of A. Washington DC Federal charity may own a for profit LLC for handling business affairs, stocks and other valuable issues in the for profit spectrum, the Charity itself must be non-profit and fulfill all U. S. of A. Federal requirements.

Article 13 says CEC Charity accepts funds only from endowment to charity from me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari for a gifting reason. I expect no Charity giving me any funds for any reason that I can concieve and I use no other Charity or Foundation to represent me at all.

Article 14 has the Charity agreeing to shoulder the cost of its own association separate from me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, since a benevolent association such as the CEC is separate from me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari’s, and my corpus title and needs. If there is ever a need for arbitration between my Foundation and the CEC Charities, I don't want to have any standing in the matter at all. Full endowment is given to the Foundation and any escrows created because of CEC lack of audit are not my business but Charity business amongst the non-profit community.

Article 15 has the set up fees paid by me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, as part of the cost of his endowment business and as is normal for umbrella charity foundations set up in Washington D. C. Federally. I did this to make sure they all conform to law and nothing which is unacceptable to Federal rules slips through the cracks.

Article 16 says Charity is not going to act like a rogue or outlaw agency inside the U. S. of A but abide by all pertinent Federal charitable laws and procedures or risk de-funding under other rules infra. If a Charity is set to take care of family and that family is not served by that Charity with notices to Foundation and U. S. Congressional Court authorities, then, Court rules affect further resolution thereto. My Foundation's only concern is legal filing and seeming compliance to U. S. Code, challenge thereto causes immediate either arbitration or filing for resolution to the pertinent civil court in Washington DC.

Article 17 is called in NYS the Rockefeller gag proviso, meaning Charity cannot continue to be funded if its agents or parties act against me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, or his family in any way. My gift is not set up to cause harm and I will not fund a charity that is libeling, slandering or causing harm to my family or my corpus. That would be illogical and unwise. Therefore, this gag provision exists to protect the giftor's ability to earn more to give more which is quite logical.

Article 18 follows up Article 17 by defining who are agents or parties to block funding of Charity. If a Charity beneficiary allows his lawyer, family or agent to bad mouth IDPixie LLC, myself, Abdul Tawala Alishtari, or the Foundation, then, that is the same as doing it yourself and you suffer the same consequences. You might ask legally for my Foundation to show cause and I have directed my foundation to not only videotape records, affidavits and all statements but to back it up with twice the proofs necessary to make it rock hard.

Article 19 covers a private gag, as in memos, talk, chat or verbal poison pen and personality assassination, which is covered by any media. There are those now who are running blogs to destroy the CEC Charity and me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari. This was written before those blogs existed so if evidence links anyone to those blogs, their Charities suffer. It is my thinking the only reason someone doesn't want a Charity funded is that entity cannot allow an audit thereto because of irregularities in the trusteeship thereto. Otherwise, it is only logical to let profit gift to beneficiaries. If there are any other views of why, I am interested in hearing them.

Article 20 gives a hold harmless for any acts, which may be perceived to be against the CEC Charity like funding expansion and overhead instead of declaring bigger profits and making more for the pool of CEC Charities. The purpose of a for profit business it profits and gifting though in this case set up in advance is a secondary activity. It is easy for Charities to criticize the building of a building since they do not know the business plan serving board owners and they should not know those privy details which only generally have anything to do with the CEC Charity itself.

Charities. Article 21 protects me, Mr. Abdul Alishtari, and my corpus, from errors or harmful acts by the CEC Charities, their trustees or the charities beneficiaries, which is needed since I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, as settler, cannot be seen to be in collusion with any criminal behavior from whatever sector. Lets say a Charity does a crime and says I advised them either to do it or was managing that crime, well, I cannot nor would not be party or linked to any criminal activity by anyone of any persuasion.

Article 22 stops quibbling over cross-charitable giving since there is no restriction on my, Mr. Alishtari, and my Foundation giving more to charities and this document only sets the minimum limits. Lets say one Charity is building hospitals and I decide to buy ambulances, no other Charity has the right to say where is my ambulances or equal sums in cash as a right of giving from my endowment so agreed.

Article 23 sets U. S. of A. Federal venue good standing qualifications for trustees so that they may be established which usually means getting finger printed and possibly lie detector tested as well as whatever is standard to satisfy US of A standards. If you are a crook, liar, thief, get lost.

Article 24 means all disputes will be handled by one local agency known to my, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari’s, counsels and of high quality. Local means inside Washington DC and known to various Federal Foundation authorities as an agency of choice for this act.

Article 25 means any criticism Mr. Alishtari for term of 20 years will stop Charity funding as an adverse act at such time of offense. Before the media age, sour grapes were letters to the editor or even letters to pertinent authorities however today the Internet proves some garbage, especially lies and hurtful slander, is permanent. Therefore, the results for doing such crimes and hurtful acts should be equally permanent.

Charity beneficiaries who make uneducated statements about funds, false investments or lease rebates are talking about an animal that is a legal chimera that does not exist legally or in fact. Such talk indicates either the alleged Charity beneficiary is adverse to its trustee of record or that beneficiary needs to adjust, command its trustee to act according to this deal as shown before and above respectively.

Anyone giving promises on my Foundation to be set by me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari thereto is a liar. Only I, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, control my corpus charitable endowment deal related to the forgiveness/settlement/endowment affidavit deal mentioned in these particulars. Without a respective signed affidavit by both parties, there is no funding or deal legally.

Furthermore even in the case of a gift program, accurate audits regarding how many beneficiaries and who they are must be made to me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, by the CEC, the Charity Association, as well as proof respective Charity beneficiaries empowered their trustees in a fair legal agreement acceptable under U. S. of A. Federak Law.

If there are trustees acting for anyone other than all their Charity beneficiaries or attempting to hide any international crime done by them, that act is violating the letter and spirit of endowment giving.

In addition, Charity beneficiaries might impeach a trustee with evidences. Trustees might impeach other trustees for control of a Charity for any reason and anything that is normal charitable activity is accepted my me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari, for my corpus gift giving program and will not stop funding of charities per se through my Foundation for escrows.

Part 5

As I reflect in my journal on "Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari Takes ID Theft Protection From the US to the UAE and back Part 4", at some point patent violators like Citibank, Visa, Discovery, EBay/PayPal and JPMorganChase/Oribiscom amongst others must be addressed since there is obvious patent infringements piling up ripe for rights picking.

In 2004, I sent these banking groups cease and desists or proprietary notices. Citibank within the month anounced it was stopping its card offering single use credit card numbers and American Express abandoned, then, its development towards a virtual credit card product in the marketplace for awhile.

In January 2004, I offered for sale pending patents and even put up my prime patent for sale. This led many patent violators corporate counsels to sign a non-disclose/non-compete in order to see our USPTO file wrappers. To those who weren't violating our patent in 2003 like MNBA, I sent a certified notice to their legal counsel that patent number US 6,598.031 B1 was granted to Mr. Jeffrey Ice, Inventor, for "APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ROUTING ENCRYPTED TRANSACTION CARD IDENTIFYING DATA THROUGH A PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK" i.e. Internet, phones or any electronic medium in the U. S. of A which was owned then by EDI Secure LLLP, now IDPixie LLC.

US laws let all patents filed after 2000 to be open for review however patents filed in 1998 and 1999 don't fit that law so they can only see it with my written permission. Not all of them agreed to the NDA but, well half did. All these virtual credit card numbers are covered under our patent which was so specifically written that, well, read it yourself, there is no way around it.

Patent attorneys wanted my patent to be more general so it would apply to PDA and telephone devices however I know the person who owns that PDA/cell phone patent generally. His patent is indeed more general but not general enough to compete with my patent. I argued I would rather ambush one patent violator conspicuously and freeze either bank accounts or stop its ability to violate patent using electronic medium, i.e. the Internet. However either approach required a war chest making a DC patent attorney rich so I looked at other options since my business plan has a way to have my cake and eat it too by offering my service directly to consumers while capturing all competition passively. Confidentiality requires I not say more on this front.

Furthermore, Ebay's lead corporate counsel said he was more interested in our pending patent which is Micropayments. That patent almost came through last year but the USPTO said it violated a previous patent, our single use credit card number one, which is, well, our tax dollars in action. This is like saying you cannot get spare tires for your daddy's car which he lets you drive. Anyway, Ebay offered us I think $150,000.00 USD more or less, for the pending patent though they are already violating it big time.

At the same time Ebay owns PayPal which is doing business with Visa. JPMorganChase Bank's Orbiscom in Scotland. Orbiscom owns a patent similar but not identical to ours in Scotland but not in the U. S. of A. Orbiscom once had its stock devalued after it let analysts surmise Orbiscom, without correction, might own the U. S. of A. patent we own. Orbiscom's patent doesn't have the right to take private ID offline using devices and link to central servers through those devices to do a single use credit card number. It has applied for the right to apply its patent in the U. S. of A. We own these patent rights the U. S. of A. for single use pads with central servers and they own, well, the UK and possibly other areas outside the U. S. of A.

In December 2003, I won a major victory against an E-Gold Panamanian Corporate licensee when my subsidiary, GlobalProtector.Net, Inc., got a TRO against a foreign bank debit card agency for violating U. S. of A. rights since the U. S. Federal Court at 60 Center Street ruled that any purchase of bank services using an American located PC was an American deal in U. S. venue for rule of U. S. of A. rules, code and consumer protection. Even I went "Yippee" This let me freeze its USD accounts at First National City bank of California and NYS.

I liked this ruling so much I later in 2004 sold GlobalProtector.Net, Inc. to EDI Secure LLLP for $1 USD to get around the gag order upon settlement I agreed to not reveal that E-Gold license's official name which I haven't done. However, GlobalProtector.Net, Inc.'s lawsuit in U. S. Federal Court is public record which honors the gag order. There is a statement I must say which is "The parties have settled this dispute and there is nothing more I have to say on the issue."

However, looking past that issue, this TRO is a precedent for IDPixie LLC for rights enforcement by saying if the U. S. of A. has venue on all offshore bank services originated from a U. S. of A. PC or phone line. This puts venue for consumer protection, as IDPixie LLC seeks to protect its customers from foreign violation of U. S. laws. Screw civil suits, freeze their funds for ignoring U. S. Patents, Code and Law.

The U. S. of A. Congress went even further by incorporating the Depression Era "Buy American Laws" under Homeland Security Laws in 2005. This makes it illegal in some cases, where government accounts or government funded accounts are concerned for offshore bank companies to control over 50% of the product including programming and devices for financial services. This led Cyota of Israel to sell itself to a U. S. company which then was bought by another. Cyota said at one time on its web page the crown jewel of its programming was the virtual credit card, single use credit card number however after Cyota executives chanced to meet Mr. Ice and myself at an Orlando conference, they took it off their website.

With all this, why am I not kicking bank ass all over Wall St? There was a failed takeover by a Canadian now felon in 2003-2004 of my GlobalProtector.Net, Inc. subsidiary. Seperately, I sued E-Gold licensess for freezing much of my funds to which E-Gold and its licensess all settled favorably to me. So, I had to sell shares to recapitalize my ID theft platform. It had been dismantled by the Canadian felon's agents that stole my products to sell to other clients unsuccessfully. So, I decided to license patent litigation out to someone who said he had the wherewithall to act and split profits.

In 2003, IDPixie LLC's predecessor company, EDI Secure LLLP started negotiating an agreement done in 2004 with two companies owned by Brian Schaffner. This gave Mr. Schaffner's companies the legal right to prosecute corpus patents both pending and granted for EDI Secure LLLP, now IDPixie LLC. In 2004, Mr. Schaffner paid EDI Secure LLLP to extend his mandate for another year through 2005. Since Mr. Schaffner is a personal associate of the Inventor, Mr. Jeffrey Ice, I conceded thinking worse case he will test the waters which I had already primed. I felt with all the before, even a blind man can run into a nut. Obviously, there was something else going on, what, only time will tell but after two years of no activity we can discern, I refuse to give Mr. Schaffner another go at the troth.

For whatever reason, Mr. Schaffner chose not to prosecute corpus patents successfully even though it would have given him a large portion of the collection and also a seperate deal on the licensing. However, I held back until his license expired since I didn't want him suing IDPixie LLC or me because we violated any of his rights.

While Mr. Schaffner was non-performing, I was contacted by a Lebanese Muslim guy named Suleiman affiliated with Platinum Group. His American cousins gave me a contract saying I will assign his group my patents and he will guarantee me 66% of my royalty income, if any. However, he wanted all control and I know he knew nothing how to take my product to market which I had done in the past in 2000 and 2001. So, I made changes to his deal. Then, Suleiman, blew up and screamed at me out saying he would not pay me "One dime, one dinar, one riyalh, one cent for it and I had better give in or else since he represented Arab trust ownership of Citibank and JPMorganChase bank." I thanked him for his interest and hung up.

Later that year, another Lebanese Christian who owns US media companies and casinos. Does everyone today own casinos? Anyway, he offerred me $127 millions USD with $10 million USD in cash and the rest in a credit line against his IPO company from Greece. His company President was someone the FBI visited my offices seeking ten years before when he emigrated to Russia becoming Russian. My lawyers rejected this deal that would let me to litigate patents since they felt it might relate to a Russian/Greek/Egyptian person who was earlier known to be affiliated with E-Gold licensees we were suing.
One day on the street in Brooklyn, a car screeched to a stop and this billionaire jumped out screaming and hollering "Abdul Tawala Your fucking (my) lawyers are idiots and I raised over $600 millions USD in my IPO. Your lawyers should kiss my fucking ass! The idiots."

Then, later another Canadian who knew the felon in Canada but who said he was with a group fighting to reclaim assets conspicuously known as the "Trust". He also represented a number of Charities, though not all settled with the CEC and myself in the Bahamas.

Since relations were good, he knew of several negotiations with persons who did not prove funds so he waited until Mr. Schaffner's license was up to offer his own deal. This deal was his group would make approximately 70% plus costs for litigating patents and he would control all funds. His presentation was this was only fair to the Charities but upon inspection, it did not include all charities, just those he deemed, well good guys.

I cease to be shocked by anything originating from Canada and I cancelled this Canadian's rights to offer me a deal. The killer here was his associate who put this "great" deal together told me his guys had reason to not trust me. I think I won my battle with the first Canadian felon and I don't identify anyone settling with me as a victim since it is just business coming back onshore legally. One thing you cannot do to any Arab anywhere is question his honor. Deal killer.

I rejected multi-millions payoffs just because the deal stunk for the IDPixie LLC. I sold all my houses, cars, penthouses and luxuries to keep IDPixie LLC afloat. I showed honor in settling with equipment leases in The Bahamas from my own personal profits when I could have just written it off and sold out. I did not go to the beach as all the Canadian felon felt I would. I am not a regular capitalist since I see myself as an industrialist, who protects capitalists and capital, by re-organizing the profitability in ID theft industry protection. I rejected the first Arab deal because this is not a flip cash out but an industry that is needed by all in the world. I might have nay sayers who see me as a robber baron but sour grapes aside, bless their ignorance. In the world, we need ignorant people to be shocked after the good guys win. It increases our satisfaction.

Despite poison pen letters and bogus attack sites, a fellow from Pakistan called me and said "I hired your CFO two years ago and I need to meet with you." So I let his limousine pick me up and take me to Wall Street, well actually to the piers next to Wall Street to a rented yacht. There he showed me, lets say, he had possession of lots of cash in his accounts from his laptop. He wanted to back me for $100 million USD with no contract. Well, it took lots of 5 star hotel and yacht meetings to get a signed deal on August 13, 2006.

There was one problem. My investor didn't want to show up and I cannot hide him. You buy shares; you show up. Secondly, he didn't want me to sue anyone. Not sue anyone! Even a philantrophist cannot walk away from that much money in the billions. If this was a movie, I don't know if it'd be a comedy or a tragedy. When I laugh, I also sigh.

I adopted a Pakistani boy and I have a whole Pakistani family, that of the founder of the Pakistani Day Parade, Tariq Kholkar, who adopted me too. Still, South Asians and Arabs try to work together as Muslims but our adab, customary courtesies , are not always the same. I like this guy but I had to default him. The day before I defaulted him I got a call from one of my Gulf friends, a Sharif, just a title and he said, "Can we buy this other guy out?" I said, "I thought you guys wanted control?" He said, "We figure this is our thing and you are one of us my brother." I love that adab stuff. He said "We funded you before to build our Gulf EDI in the UAE which we, well, all profited from handsomely. So, we require you stay in charge. We'll give you the cash in increments. Have the contract ready when I return."

I felt bad for my Pakistani friend who called back later saying could he still fund $100 million USD for the global IDPixie Global LTD in the UAE in our old offices there in Fujairah to license central banks and postal banks worldwide. I said "I don't see why not!" I said, "I must sell your U. S. of A. IDPixie LLC shares to my Arab friends". He said he understood but he wanted all his global businesses to have ID theft protection. I said to him "Man plans and God plans; and God is the best of planners." So, I guess it is a comedy after all unless of course one is a patent infringer, then I guess it could be a little tragedy until they get licensed. Then, it is a comedy for everyone save cyber felons who have no recourse save to go back to kidnappings and bank robbery by armed force. Now, that is a story for this decade.

Part 4

As I said before in my journal on "Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari Takes ID Theft Protection From the US to the UAE and back Part 3", I think character stands for something. I started 30 years ago with one motto, Integrity, Excellence and Veracity. Veracity leads to another motto which I toyed with "In God we Trust, Everyone Else Must Verify!" I abandoned that as too arrogant although I believe that.

If the center of a company, say, IDPixie LLC, you have integrity and people who are morally cnetered, then having the top Internet Protection U.S. of A. patent means something since lack of integrity transcends even the best product. I think the IDPixie LLC ID theft protection product came from the integrity of the people working for IDPixie LLC and its predecessor companies, GlobalProtector.Net, Inc. and EDI Secure LLLP.

It is that company and personal integrity which is why when the chips were down and a takeover by a Canadian felon failed, we succeeded partially because our consortium of technicians and inventors turned their back on being bought out, hired away or losing faith from lies, poison and psychological manipulations.

They kept the faith or as civil rights activists say, their eyes on the prize. My leadership of this team through this crisis humbles me. Not a day goes by, I, Mr. Abdul Taw'ala Ibn Ali Al Ishtari, do not think on my personal integrity. I know there are companies now violating my patent and offering security which they really cannot offer.

The chimera of internet security online is a lie which everyone knows yet most analysts don't want to say the emperor has no clothes because, well, it might destroy some IT giants however the result is the same. The depositor is offered limited protection from loss and almost no way to regain one's reputation after ID thieves have savaged your reputation from ID theft.

Indeed, some people are harassed for years by collection companies when they can prove they didn't do it. The collection agency doesn't care because the damage to your credit is real right now.

I have had my own problems recognizing the good guys from the bad guys. It seems that they all say the same thing. I am the only one you can trust and no one else is trustworthy. If I was a dating single teenager, I'd be celibate since one lie can destroy your life. People even declare undying loyalty and affection to me like I love your system and flatter me.

Can I give you a key to my customers. Hell no! Why do you think I locked the door in the first place? One writer said its the three piggies analogy. The wolf blows down the house of straw, the house of sticks but the house of stones and bricks holds.

I think there has been a leap from the multi-level sales organizations of the 1960's into the multi-chunking organizations of the 2000's. People are sold a criminal path originally saying this is how real people make money and then they are paid to participate in what is in essence money laundering for a fee.

Like all criminal enterprises they risk at first for a little fee, then, emboldened by not being caught, stopped or interfered with, they get more casual until they think whatever criminal activity the ponzi scam leader is perpetrating must be legal, or at least legal enough for what they know and get paid to do. It takes probably years for them to take say a taxi driver and turn him into a full time money launderer using various scams.

The average person unfortunately is beset with media that says crime pays. The Russian mafia is legitimized, only killing people that are disloyal to it. Due to new bank offices and sheer numbers, there are more Russians at Citibank. Various reports like the Adkinson Report said from 2001 that most of the money laundering was being done a major banks like Citibank over small offshore banks.

I disagree. I think most by volume is done by major center banks because well, a small bank cannot launder a billion for anyone but the majority of fraud by volume I t hink is going to these chunkers who set up business in the form of a multi-level sales organization or even a multi-level foundation for charity that washes funds for a fee giving it to beneficiaries who might not qualify under Federal code as one for charitable write off domestically.

Integrity is best seen not by accusations since anyone can accuse. Look at Trump and Rosie. He says. She says. He denies and she derides and vice versa. No, integrity is about something more akin to healing and the Hippocratic Oath to cause no harm. If someone is seen going into a building with a torch saying I'm looking for an arsonist, it is clear they are fooling themselves when they say I almost caught him but the place caught afire.

Identify thieves are pretending to be banks, as police and as victims but there is one thing identity ID thieves cannot pretend to be for long. They cannot claim to own my patent number US 6,598.031 B1 to Mr. Jeffrey Ice, Inventor, for "APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ROUTING ENCRYPTED TRANSACTION CARD IDENTIFYING DATA THROUGH A PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK" i.e. Internet, phones or any electronic medium in the U.S. of A. They can claim to have a solution but not my patented by USPTO solution since to do so they would have to fight IDPixie LLC control of royalty, right and privilege assigned from EDI Secure LLLP.

In fact, anyone owning this royalty right would be insane to be involved in activities which defrauded banks when even selling that right would give that person or agency millions and possibly billions of legal income. This is why I found it disingenius when a Canadian felon and his partners criticized me, Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari. That they use false names and rinkey dink scam site placed in Asia to avoid blocking it is further proof of the lack of their integrity. I am not hiding, why are they as they optimize their site to stop me.

They don't understand me very well. Thirty years ago when I left Democratic politics for Republican politics, I was told as an ex-banking official I must leave the New York State if I wanted to become successful. Ten years later, these very same bank regulators had to admit that not only had I succeeded as an underwriter but also that a type of banking, called Microbanking, which I championed had become US Small Business Administration policy. Furthermore, I had the distinction of being the only Muslim underwriter who got the U.S. of A. government to approve interest free taxi cab and transportation funding loans for the Arab medallion cab community.

So when people schemed to oust me from my IDPixie LLC's predecessor company and take over my patents, you can guess what my response was. More akin to "Go to Hell!" is more like what I said. I understand ID theft from the inside out. I had people call me saying they lent me funds and did not.

An admitted felon gave them my name as to where moneys were sent however a review of where where moneys were sent shows it is not the same. In other words, they are victims of fraud. Someone would take a legal lease in 2001 and tell people in 2003 a lease is proof an illegal security years later was somehow from me. Give me a break. Lets take worst case scenario, why would anyone with a real patent gold mine sell fools gold to anyone for any sum. It makes no sense.

My problem was I think some people actually believed they gave me funds when they went to someone else who was merely going to dump the problem on me and run off saying they lost money too. I found out about this by an investor in a Nevada company that stole IT from me plus my sales staff saying and calling their crime a "dump and run". Otherwise, I would only call it cyber fraud like everyone else.

One major problem with ID theft is, well, it is so new that much of it hasn't been codified. It is all fraud but is it money laundering, or extortion, or more inducing others to theft like entrapment or something, well, entirely new. The cyber crime sleuths and criminals don't even know what to call this new crime wave themselves. I like worm wars because it sounds more accurate to my mind.

Some say the white hats are sometimes black hats which means todays hacker working with the police might be putting worms in to thwart the police tomorrow. It is convoluted, complex and the bad guys like it that way.

IDPixie LLC's platform as it goes online will level the playing field since the simple common denominator in all the cyber theft, extortion and what have you today is they, the bad guys, by whatever name, have got to get your ID and make others believe they are you for a moment at least to steal from you or defraud others in your name. If you can stop them from getting your private ID and bank data, game over. Guess what? Taking private ID and PIN numbers offline using a single use card ID number online does that perfectly and exactly.

Why do the crooks want to keep my product from the market? Well, why would the pied piper want to get rid of the cats when he is bringing in rats? The answer is the same. IDPixie LLC theft protection system works simply, completely and perfectly.

IDPixie LLC's white paper says so conclusively and its business plan is exceptional. However, IDPixie LLC is so consumer friendly that it gives consumer privacy back to the depositors which global central bank treaties took from them. That is good. One has to choose who does one trust. Oneself or the banks. Let me think this over for a second. OK, I trust me. If you are anything like me, you trust you.

Therefore, the present bank system relies on the user using software to keep ID offline. I use softwae on hardware that is not online so you cannot give your ID away in a phishing trick. And, even if you do give it away, IDPixie LLC's licensed device and platform keeps anyone else from stealing your ID or PIN from you. This is like magically taking a door into your bank and blocking it with Pixie dust, er, IDPixie dust that is taking what is your pivotal ID offline permanetly so it cannot be hacked.

Part 3

As I said before in my journal on "Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari Takes ID Theft Protection From the US to the UAE and back Part 2", I cannot avoid fraud and misrepresentation today. I can only manage how ethically and professionally I handle it. I sued a lot of companies, not only because they stole my money. By the way, that is a good reason for doing so, but considering that I won and got virtually nothing more than legal fees, I had another critical reason.

One reason was these E-Gold debit card platforms licensees had offers or licenses which if I did not go after them would allow them to use my ID theft protection system. So, I ostensibly went after these E-Gold licensees for 3 years from 2002 through 2005 to get my monies which were stolen by two seperate E-Gold licensees. One of them culminated in one company, Standard Reserve's bankruptcy in Tortola BVI and its testifying against its licensor and shareholder E-Gold, itself. That worked out for me severally since they settled based upon legal irregularities with its lawyer's insurance out of Maryland and its public statements thereto.

As indicated before, the Canadian felon had several agents infiltrate my contractors. One a female, at first, volunteered, and then later was paid, by Rising Star Telecommunications, Inc. to be the prime overseer of E-Gold, Standard Reserve and E-Bullion’s bonafides as well as all other licensees seeking a contract from me.

Her idea was someone, anyone, somehow must takeover over my business from me if possible since I cannot be trusted by anyone. This ID theft worldwide network uses what is called chunkers, agents who sell services as experts to do just part of ID theft, inflitration, hacking or whatever is needed. Anyone owning an offshore company, is automatically a target for fraud from ID theft since you won't even know crimes were committed in your name until local, say, Canadian authorities show up and your denial is planned by their scam. They leave enough evidence to make it seem you are lying.

ID theft chunkers destroy your onshore credibility so if you return onshore, as I did, that destroys their original plan to say you just ran off with the money and it turns the light upon them which they hate. When asked in court why Dr. Elwyn Jenkins thought he could get away with his thefts, his answer surprised everyone. He said users of offshore banking groups are mostly criminals and money launderers who cannot afford to complain if they loose a some cash to the tax of running a system. In other words, he cannot steal from a crook.

The problem was I am not a crook so I chased him all over the world, even impeaching his testimony in Australian court where he said he didn't have accounts as my private eye videotaped him going into ATM accounts he said didn't exist. We had dumpster divers prove deposits and withdrawals destroying his testimony. After 9-11, having an Australian judge agree with an American Arab against an Australian I had to have a hell of a case. He sent me an email. "Please call your dogs off!" I thought cyber thieves didn't have a sense of humor.

My family started like all other immigrants, works hard and has not one felon in it. We advised 4 U.S. of A. presidential staffs, Nixon, Carter, Reagan and Bush (1), as well as 5 foreign heads of state severally on technology and banking. My brother worked for the late Secretary of Commerce and I was an aide running the NYS Assembly Committee on Banks agenda from 1976-1980. The lie I cannot be trusted is insane but any lie said enough times takes on a patina of truth. The best compliment I was told by one political leader thirty years ago is an insult given by an evil person is the best compliment.

I am a NYU certified bank underwriter. I was a member of Arab Bankers Association of North America, corporately listed on the same page for quality of deals as Citibank. I was a licensed royal banker by foreign court certified mandate. I was invited to work on US of A commissions advising Republican legislators and I met even with Vice President Chaney. I have never violated any bank laws and am a respected member of the U.S. of A. banking community yet I am slandered by an admitted money launderer whose family was legally stopped for doing securities fraud by Ontario's OSC. Libeled by a known partner to persons doing illicit securities fraud globally.

My ex-employer, Mr. Robert F. Schlageter, Jr., CEO, Metran Funding Inc. introduced me as I was an underwriter to the Empire State Banker's Association saying, "Abdul Tawala is the most honest banker I know and thats no compliment." The laugh brought down the house since an inside name some bankers use for each other is whores.

E-gold was once on good terms with me in 2001 and then one of its board members introduced a Russian/Greek/Egyptian Christian businessman who wanted to buy out my patents pending and my system of ID theft protection. Talk about the fox watching the hen house. The Russian had a chance to meet the Canadian felon's female mole. I don't know for whom this chunker was working for really. She got hired by one subcontractor and there she brought me two E-Gold licensees that both ran off with my funds. Both were sued and lost. One went bankrupt, that being Standard Reserve LTD, but I got a Mareva, a global TRO freezing their accounts bringing it to heel. After Standard Reserve LTD turned on E-Gold, E-Gold settled later on insurance since it violated its attorney insurance policy.

My attorneys say my chance of winning all that was 30% however I beat the odds since I videotaped Standard Reserve's LTD's representations in the BVI and I had witnesses do affidavits for onshore with E-Gold so they were easily impeached especially with Standard Reserve LTD giving evidence from Australia on E-Gold to end my case against it.

While I was doing that, the Canadian felon was telling everyone who would listen I had their money which I wish I had since I could easily pay it back from profits but I don’t have their money since he was so greedy he kept all he raised onshore money laundering offshore. My records indicated only legal funds. Like Alice through the looking glass, cyber thieves, security frauds, mysterious Russians, oh my.

The Canadian felon thought I might run offshore after the 9-11 hysteria and he would get immunity for turning me in while he had all his cash allegedly given to me. That was brilliant in a criminal way. His partner and mafia felt they must takeover my businesses. He got his agent to push her own candidate to run my business while working for a contractor. Further, she volunteered to supervise my hiring and she kept from me other top resumes while foisting upon me one resume that did not even come from where I advertised online. I did hire the guy since he was the best qualified of who applied however his verification was up to the person who was an ally to the Canadian partner. One Canadian used to fly down to my offices, put his feet up on my desks and brag to my employees I was no longer relevant. His agent’s officer even said I had already sold the company to all of them, as they had even proffered no such thing to me yet. They knew that my funds in E-Gold licensees would freeze whie making up a $3.5 million USD contract with another subcontractor. Later, that subcontractor admitted to a third party in memos leaked to me they knew their conspiracy to each other admitting asubcontractor had no intention of fulfilling my DOD contracts to drain me dry so they, as a group, could steal everything.

In January 2004, the last head of Bahamian equipment leasing foundation met with GlobalProtector.Net, Inc.'s board. The Canadian guy wrote down some numbers on a napkin representing $10 millions USD. This was rejected by me since I said, I cannot do business with a felon since my company then had submissions with the US DOD. In a huff, they both left as if they knew something I didn’t.

One Canadian said to me before my board that a felon in Washington State U.S. of A. is in jail for securities fraud and he made a similar error. He said that guy was in jail not because he committed crimes but since he trusted others who did and they made deals first. I thought it odd since my strategy of honoring U.S. of A. authorities was complete until my funds ran out. The facts I gave the SEC and FBI later led the Canadian felon to make his settlement striking all the claims I directed him to do any crime from his official settlement.

His Canadian partner, of record, opened another Nevada company, that funded a San Diego California Company manned by my ex-salemen who were his partners. With my sales staff, the pirates failed to sell my IT the market was clamoring for since GlobalProtector.Net, Inc. was my sales company for EDI Secure LLP that later became IDPixie LLC. My sales company did not own my ID theft protection patents technology. One Canadian's partner's put memo said their president ran off with their funds for this pirate venture. I guess thieves really cannot steal from other thieves since no court case ensued from it.

Meanwhile, the Canadian felon and his partners asked everyone to sue me. One lady from Las Vegas threatened to turn me in to the FBI if I didn't give her money. I didn't know who this was and my attroney advised the FBI that she tried to extort moneys. My position is always to take a pro law stance and not be forced to pay hush money since I know I do nothing illegal at any time. The Canadian who was arrested saidI would be arrested for directing him and that he would walk for turning evidence on me. Only one problem, the money trail lead away from me but to his offshore coffers.

Regardless, I knew I had to settle the Bahamian Freeport leases since that would show who was legal and who was not. I needed to know it even more so than the authorities since the Canadians had lied so successfully to everyone it was almost impossible to figure out who was saying what. Also, them forging my letterhead made many people dubious of me until I settled the entire fiasco in writing to everyone's satisfaction.

So even though I had agressive cases going on against E-Gold licensees moving successfully, I stopped and negotiated, in the fall of 2003, a successful forgiveness/settlement/endowment deal on affidavits with a counsel of record, Mr. Michael Grosh from Canada making all the Bahamian leases moot and settling on onshore contributions later from ID Theft protection going to market from charitable endowment. When I went to DC in the Fall of 2003 and met with VP Cheney, I was first in a room full of advisors where I asked how to resolve this and they advised me to talk to counsels which led to this solution.

I set up through settlement affidavits another ad hoc organization now representing charity beneficiaries, the Charitable Endowment Council. This set me up so I could go after reorganization since the Canadians had done a fine job of sabotage which was remarkable. Then, they set up web sites in 2004 blaming me and trying to encourage others or anyone to stay away from me. I went to the three web sites and two of them retracted their negative press once they saw the facts. The third site used a false name found on a Monopoly board and was placed in Asia so I would be able to take it down. Their memos leaked to me said they would poison me so that no one would touch me. Thank God, I own the better mousetrap and in 2005 the FFIEC would mandate that the U.S. of A. banks use top authentication available or else. Guess who owns that patent. Sometimes the good guys do win.

Prior to August 2006 real deal, real offers came in from 2 groups and false deals from 7. I determine that half those offers were from affiliates of the Canadian felon, either pro or con to him, to try to takeover or steal the patents which was done so ineffectually at first.

So, IDPixie has accepted a deal for funding and it is negotiating interim funding too. IDPixie LLC fights for its rights and royalties coming from its patent number US 6,598.031 B1 to Mr. Jeffrey Ice, Inventor, for "APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ROUTING ENCRYPTED TRANSACTION CARD IDENTIFYING DATA THROUGH A PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK" i.e. Internet, phones or any electronic medium in the US of A.

Part 2

As I said before in my journal on "Mr. Abdul Tawala Alishtari Takes ID Theft Protection From the US to the UAE and back", there were many reasons why the best ID theft protection system in U.S. of A. history which was actuve and fully functional from 2000 to 2001, must come back to save the U.S. of A. market from massive ID theft fraud.

I had the ability to stop all cyber crooks from breaking into U. S. of A. bank private accounts by taking private ID and PIN numbers off the Internet in 2000. However, the system was not in the U. S. of A. but offshore. The product was not only in the market then but was licensed to Hewlett-Packard for manufacturing in an in PC device, to German banks and to American banking groups. However, the dot com boom plus the mass collapse of the global banking system had not occured until two years later.

Most IT companies think of before the dot com boom and after the dot com boom mentality. Basically and ironically, I couldn't give it away until the marketplace was seasoned with unbelievable trauma and also FFIEC mandate saying hey the answer is authentication using the highest US standards. These standards indicate using a device, either wireless wand or hard wire device to take ID off the Internet and use one time pad, single use credit card number.

The patent granted to EDI Secure LLLP, now IDPixie LLC is known as patent number US 6,598.031 B1 to Mr. Jeffrey Ice, Inventor, for "APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ROUTING ENCRYPTED TRANSACTION CARD IDENTIFYING DATA THROUGH A PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK" i.e. Internet, phones or any electronic medium in the US of A. My patent pending was granted July 22, 2003. Therefore, I marketed it before granting of patent as a screening ASP for use by bank depositors with lots of neat controls within it.

Some bank owners liked this and others resisted it, well, for many reasons. Most bankers are not known for accepting modern or new technology save for programming that is easily accepted. So, bankers sought big guns of IT with a magic bullet put together by, say, RSS, or a Microsoft type agency to solve their ID theft problems. As Arab banker managers sought to protect their inside point discount on all currency standby credit which made them rich, most of them could not see my solution puts power in the hands of depositors, as the depositor decides to shop. My solution is too customer friendly and it allows customers to do much more than write checks but updates their ability to do global commerce from their checking ASP from any PC without hacking onto their mobile ASP linked to their device and not to the PC. This is miles beyond what anyone else has even thought about respectively.

Inside point discount is legal in the US of A where many bank bosses gets paid for just borrowing Federal funds by declaring bank rate higher than Federal debt rate and pocketing the difference. This is illegal in Scriptural religionists insist on avoiding that conflict entirely.

To scriptural, Bible, Torah, Koran based peoples, all dealings should be without usury and accepted by all parties. Therefore, no floating rates. A billion might cost less than $2 USD to move and not float to make bankers richer. All excessive, usurious fees for no work stop. In a mega-trillion dollar business of oil remittances, this represents a wave of corruption drowning logic to do a safe, flat, ID secure plan.

I was offered $40 million USD in 2000 and in 2006, another $127 million USD to walk away from my ID theft platform in favor of one serving credit. If I accepted it, I could go to the beach. I considered it and said no since I cannot betray what is, in essence, my baby. I wanted to turn my system on again like it was in 2000 to 2001 because I believed in it.

Then, in 2001, my Gulf employers gave me their offshore company in the UAE. This did not go over well with bankers who now felt my rejecting a profitable, capitalist offer was to them dangerous and showed I was dangerous and possibly too religious.

It got back to me some thought I might bargain for $400 million USD or a billion USD but it had never occurred to any of them I might reject profit period. Since none of them had ever done that, it horrified them. My not accepting their buy out meant I must be a religious extremist. In the 1990's, I used the sunshine laws in the U. S. of A. to get the CIA and FBI to respond to me in writing I was not under investigation then. These letters were made public on the Internet.

Then, a Russian/Egyptian/Greek called me for a meeting set by a board member of E-Gold. He said he controlled banks in Eastern Europe and he wanted to control my patents pending then. He said I could name my price and I said nothing after he admitted before two of my attorneys his policy killed programmers for being disloyal. I left him but he kept calling me. I literally did not know how valuable what I had done was since I built it in a fishbowl before the present ID theft crisis. I did not know I had the final solution to global ID theft online since it wasn’t a big problem then. I did not see the global picture. I was only a banker trying to build a system with security. I could say I saw the future but in fact, only God sees that, not I.

By 1996, a Canadian felon, who later admitted securities fraud severally, had at least two or three of his agents keeping an eye on me. One man, Dennis Krauter, of Canada, even made an affidavit on this felon's agents affiliated with scams for ruining offshore businesses by profiting from failure. These affidavits were published online with allegations however in them the felon's name came up for the first time. I just blocked him by adding him to my white list which is a list of bad guys I'd rather not do business with regardless of affiliations.

Thinking my problem was resolved; I focused on building a viable global top ID theft protection just to avoid all external attack online and in trade. This guy allegedly defrauded thousands in scams on illegal securities that were totally unknown to me. He tried to make me a scapegoat to dump blame upon me but thank God, the Canadian OSC released my company from their investigation after he took responsibility for the fraud personally. Still, newspapers have not retracted his false accusations and wild speculations as he paid a mere $10,000 Canadian fine agreeing to stop selling what he had no right to do in the first place.

In order for him to get my letterhead, he had as Mr. Krauter alleged several agents practicing industrial espionage either contracting to or hired by subcontractors. These persons gave him my letterhead which he used and one of his mole's later admitted doing this in an affidavit written voluntarily by him. The felon's other agent and partner of record after discovering my great products decided that sabotage wasn't enough. They had to steal the products however the engineers they corrupted could not intergrate the patent or even knew how it fully worked. They only knew one security application developed for the US Department of Defense.

The felon's partner, also a Canadian felon, had his record expunged which is to say he is not a crook though he once was. In order to get probation as a youth for grand theft auto in Canada, he accepted his guilt. His family members, per Internet links by Canada, used takeover businesses to do illegal securities or scams. His family did this and the BC Canadian government took over many of his business, from that Canadian’s male children, with same surname, who ran his takeovers. His takeover plan generally echoed a refrain on a takeover target. That refrain was the takeover, in this case me, I must go since I cannot be trusted. Whatever I cannot be trusted. I avoided a all traps for 20 years yet I cannot be trusted. Basically, these felons convinced their backers that the legal equipment leases were really investments which they had vetted. Their lies about this meant someone had to be blamed for their lack of profits. In a lease situation, the lease must become active before it generates profits. In this case, well as the record indicates, these guys greatly misrepresented what was really going on and their only way out was to blame their target with me doing something illegal. If I had committed one crime, I'd have gone down with them.

I hate the fact that when you are in business you are sued and others will steal your private ID to do harm to others. Yet, that fact is the basis of why the ID theft solution my company came up with is so powerful. Yes, it happened to me to but so what. What matters is I can stop it for you and for me permanetly and every knowledgeable IT person on the web who is an expert knows this solution will, has and must work. The fact we own the patent and the U. S. of A. market is just gravy.