Advertisement
Promo

Become a member of the ZDNet UK community

nico5038

View blog's RSS Feed

Knowledge can't be divided, only multiplied

It's the quality of the team that makes a Q&A site work

Friday 16 January 2009, 10:35 PM

Ab-normalization at Experts Exchange - part 10

Posted by nico5038

Question today:
How do I hide the Search box/filter indicator in the Record Navigator in 2007

This blog is not about the content of this question (as it's not really answered), but about abnormal behavior of the #1 Access expert of Experts Exchange in this case.

A questioner asks:
How do I hide the "Search" box and the Filter indicator next to the Record Navigation buttons on a form?

The first comment provided by the #1 Access expert:
"in the design view of the form, hit F4, select the Format tab"
"set the Navigation Buttons property to NO"

Response from the questioner:
"capricorn1 -- But that also gets rid of the Navigation Buttons, which I need! I just"
"want to get rid of the filter indicator and the search box."

Response from the #1 Access expert:
"you may have to create your own navigation button..."
and additionally a link to a piece of code for Access 97 to do this

Being not content with the provided solutions the questioner requests the question to be deleted, but....
Surprise surprise, there's an objection by the #1 expert as he'll not get his points... The reason is that his comments (including the one obviously rejected by the questioner, but who cares) would have solved the problem.

A true eye opener how questioners are bullied in accepting solutions they don't want.
Instead of helping the questioner till he's satisfied here the questioner is forced to accept an answer he doesn't want..

Guess Experts Exchange will have made a big impression on this paying customer, because of a point hunting #1 Access expert...

Great show capricorn1, proves my statement that there are still "experts" at Experts Exchange not interest in helping, but only in collecting points.
Another case added to the file of negative side effects of the Experts Exchange copyrighted point system.

Nic;o)
Still proud to be suspended from this "quality site" where wannabee experts rule and "quality" is just another word from the dictionary.
(The question can be found at: http://www.experts-exchange.com/Microsoft/Development/MS_Access/Q_23818337.html)

Saturday 3 January 2009, 1:28 PM

Ab-normalization at Experts Exchange - part 9

Posted by nico5038

The question today:
Access: Can't Add Records to Query Based on Multiple Tables

No solution is offered by capricorn1 the #1 MS Access expert, but only a Google link to Microsoft showing when it's possible and when not.

For this question a simple explanation of the Main form with linked sub form construction would have solved the problem, but that's not mentioned. Makes me wonder or this "expert" even realizes the basics of the Access architecture.

For smarter people there are sites like bytes.com where the membership is for free and the experts are cooperating to provide the best answers.

Nic;o)
Still proud to be suspended from this "quality site" where wannabee experts rule and "quality" is just another word from the dictionary.
(The question can be found at: http://www.experts-exchange.com/Microsoft/Development/MS_Access/Q_23735833.html)
PS The staff of Experts Exchange still prove to be incapable of changing my email address in my profile, will keep you posted)

nico5038
  • nico5038
  • IT Consultant
  • Member since: March 2007

Site Activity Rating 1

Contacts

Number of Contacts: 0

Contacts' Latest Discussions

Number of Tracked Discussions: 0

Contacts' Latest Blogs

Number of Contacts Blogs: 0


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters