Albert's Discussions
Evolution indeed
Talkback: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
18 comments
Updated Sunday 4 May 2008, 10:13 AM
Strange inconsistency Rob
Talkback: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
18 comments
Updated Sunday 4 May 2008, 9:14 AM
Micrsoft committed to ISO version of OOXML
Talkback: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
18 comments
Updated Saturday 3 May 2008, 8:42 AM
Point 3 wrong
Talkback: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
18 comments
Updated Friday 2 May 2008, 11:08 PM
What proof, what right
Talkback: UK standards body taken to court over OOXML
9 comments
Updated Friday 2 May 2008, 10:40 PM
When is the ISO version the wrong version, we know I...
Talkback: OOXML expert: ODF standard is broken
18 comments
Updated Friday 2 May 2008, 10:28 PM
Quitting and complaining
Talkback: UK standards body taken to court over OOXML
9 comments
Updated Friday 2 May 2008, 5:53 PM
For more balance
Talkback: UK standards body taken to court over OOXML
9 comments
Updated Friday 2 May 2008, 2:26 PM
ukuug quit BSI committee themselves prior to OOXML v...
Talkback: UK standards body taken to court over OOXML
9 comments
Updated Friday 2 May 2008, 2:18 PM
OOXML clears ISO voting
Blog post: OOXML clears ISO voting
5 comments
Updated Sunday 30 March 2008, 2:56 PM
Extensions to ODF realistic ?
Talkback: Google: OOXML 'insufficient and unnecessary'
65 comments
Updated Friday 29 February 2008, 11:04 PM
Reasons for lack of interoperbility in ODF
Talkback: Google: OOXML 'insufficient and unnecessary'
65 comments
Updated Friday 29 February 2008, 10:43 AM
Interoperability
Talkback: Google: OOXML 'insufficient and unnecessary'
65 comments
Updated Friday 29 February 2008, 7:20 AM
ODF better readable but less good for processing
Talkback: Google: OOXML 'insufficient and unnecessary'
65 comments
Updated Friday 29 February 2008, 7:11 AM
explaination
Talkback: Google: OOXML 'insufficient and unnecessary'
65 comments
Updated Friday 29 February 2008, 6:56 AM
Previous
Private message disabled
